Insights from coproduced scenarios toward urban sustainability transformations.
6 affiliations
- 1Urban Studies Institute, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30313.
- 2School of Life Sciences, Global Institute of Sustainability and Innovation, and Global Futures Lab, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287.
- 3School of Environment, Resources, and Sustainability, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
- 4Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545.
- 5Environmental Science Department, Barnard College, New York, NY 10027.
- 6International Institute of Tropical Forestry, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Río Piedras, PR 00926.
Abstract
Urban sustainability transformations call for fundamental shifts in how cities are organized, developed, and governed. Yet we need a better understanding of the diversity of visions and pathways that can enable transformative change. We address this gap through an analysis of 60 coproduced positive scenario visions and pathways developed using the Sustainable Future Scenario process, across nine US and Latin American cities participating in the Urban Resilience to Extremes Sustainability Research Network. We engaged diverse urban stakeholders-including government, nonprofit, and private decision-makers, community leaders, residents, and academic collaborators-in more than 20 coproduction workshops to explore alternative urban futures of sustainability and resilience. We examined how the coproduced scenarios represent five domains of transformative change (nature-human relationships, economic transformation, governance, social and environmental justice, and infrastructure futures) and four theories of transformative change (structural/institutional, agency/power, goals of the system, and worldviews/values). Most pathways combined multiple theories of change operating across multiple domains, revealing urban transformations as entangled rather than singular interventions. Some strategies were common across cities-car-free regions, decentralized infrastructure, community-based governance, expanded fundamental rights-yet were pursued with different transformative aims, demonstrating how a strategy's transformative intent depends on the theories of change behind it. These findings position coproduced scenarios as more than a normative or planning tool and offer an analytical approach for surfacing the possibility space of urban transformation.
Related
- Optimization of zoned irrigations to balance groundwater sustainability and crop yield under future irrigation source replacement scenarios
- Editorial: Enhancing natural and social sustainability in urban forests
- External observers’ and local users’ perceptions of vegetation and surface transformations in historic urban square renovations
- Assessing urban digital sustainability through composite indicators of digital use intensity and e-waste pressure in India
- More diverse diets and duller colours: seasonal insights into great tits urban life
BibTeX
@article{iwaniec2026insights,
title = {{Insights from coproduced scenarios toward urban sustainability transformations.}},
author = {David M Iwaniec and Nancy B Grimm and Marta Berbés Blázquez and Elizabeth M Cook and Tischa A Muñoz-Erickson and UREx City Scenarios Team},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1073/pnas.2537819123},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42886710},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Insights from coproduced scenarios toward urban sustainability transformations.
AU - David M Iwaniec
AU - Nancy B Grimm
AU - Marta Berbés Blázquez
AU - Elizabeth M Cook
AU - Tischa A Muñoz-Erickson
AU - UREx City Scenarios Team
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/16
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
DO - 10.1073/pnas.2537819123
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42886710
AB - Urban sustainability transformations call for fundamental shifts in how cities are organized, developed, and governed. Yet we need a better understanding of the diversity of visions and pathways that can enable transformative change. We address this gap through an analysis of 60 coproduced positive scenario visions and pathways developed using the Sustainable Future Scenario process, across nine US and Latin American cities participating in the Urban Resilience to Extremes Sustainability Research Network. We engaged diverse urban stakeholders-including government, nonprofit, and private decision-makers, community leaders, residents, and academic collaborators-in more than 20 coproduction workshops to explore alternative urban futures of sustainability and resilience. We examined how the coproduced scenarios represent five domains of transformative change (nature-human relationships, economic transformation, governance, social and environmental justice, and infrastructure futures) and four theories of transformative change (structural/institutional, agency/power, goals of the system, and worldviews/values). Most pathways combined multiple theories of change operating across multiple domains, revealing urban transformations as entangled rather than singular interventions. Some strategies were common across cities-car-free regions, decentralized infrastructure, community-based governance, expanded fundamental rights-yet were pursued with different transformative aims, demonstrating how a strategy's transformative intent depends on the theories of change behind it. These findings position coproduced scenarios as more than a normative or planning tool and offer an analytical approach for surfacing the possibility space of urban transformation.
SN - 0027-8424
SN - 1091-6490
ER -