Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Consensus times for monotone aggregation dynamics

Abstract

We study an asynchronous consensus dynamics on N agents: at each step a uniformly chosen agent replaces its state by f(Y1,…,Yr), where f is a fixed monotone aggregation rule and Y1,…,Yr are the states of r agents sampled uniformly with replacement. Let T be the first time at which all agents agree. Let f:{0,1}r→{0,1} be monotone and non-constant. The expected consensus time is governed by the two \emph{endpoint degrees} D0(f)=#{i:f(ei)=1} and D1(f)=#{i:f(1−ei)=0}, where ei is the ith standard basis vector and 1 the all-ones vector. If D0(f)≠ 1 and D1(f)≠ 1, then E[T]=Θ(N(1+log df)), where df counts the agents that must change state before the nearest attracting consensus is reached, so that E[T]=O(Nlog N) uniformly over initial states. If f is a dictator, E[T] is given by a voter-model formula and equals Θ(N2 Ent(p0)) with absolute constants, uniformly over the initial state, where Ent is the binary entropy and p0 the initial fraction of agents in state $1$. Otherwise exactly one of D0(f),D1(f) equals $1$ and the other equals $0$. The worst-case expected consensus time is then Θ(N2−1/m), where m≥ 2 is the least number of coordinates that force the value $1$ in the {\em residual rule} of f, defined in the paper (of its dual, when D1(f)=1).

Related

  1. Measuring Learned Monotone Temporal Aggregation at Matched Admissibility
    Yew Lee Tan
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Monotone Mixing and Distribution Dynamics
    Takashi Kamihigashi, Qingyin Ma, John Stachurski
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityarXiv
  3. On Fixed-Time Stability of Continuous Dynamics for Non-Monotone Variational Inequalities
    Sina Arefizadeh, Kunal Garg, Angelia Nedić
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textDynamical systemsOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Input-to-State Stability Framework for Fully Distributed Primal-Dual Dynamics for Quadratic GNEPs Without Multiplier Consensus
    Shao-An Yin
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Input-to-Output Stability and Consensus Control of Opinion Dynamics on Graph State-Space
    Arthur Doliveira, Christophe Roman, Guillaume Graton +1
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textDynamical systemsHALarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{mossel2026consensus,
  title = {{Consensus times for monotone aggregation dynamics}},
  author = {Elchanan Mossel},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.04468},
  eprint = {2609.04468},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04468},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Consensus times for monotone aggregation dynamics
AU  - Elchanan Mossel
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.04468
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04468
AB  - We study an asynchronous consensus dynamics on N agents: at each step a uniformly chosen agent replaces its state by f(Y_1,…,Y_r), where f is a fixed monotone aggregation rule and Y_1,…,Y_r are the states of r agents sampled uniformly with replacement. Let T be the first time at which all agents agree. Let f:{0,1}^r→{0,1} be monotone and non-constant. The expected consensus time is governed by the two \emph{endpoint degrees} D_0(f)=#{i:f(e_i)=1} and D_1(f)=#{i:f(1−e_i)=0}, where e_i is the ith standard basis vector and 1 the all-ones vector. If D_0(f)≠ 1 and D_1(f)≠ 1, then E[T]=Θ(N(1+log d_f)), where d_f counts the agents that must change state before the nearest attracting consensus is reached, so that E[T]=O(Nlog N) uniformly over initial states. If f is a dictator, E[T] is given by a voter-model formula and equals Θ(N^2 Ent(p_0)) with absolute constants, uniformly over the initial state, where Ent is the binary entropy and p_0 the initial fraction of agents in state $1$. Otherwise exactly one of D_0(f),D_1(f) equals $1$ and the other equals $0$. The worst-case expected consensus time is then Θ(N^2−1/m), where m≥ 2 is the least number of coordinates that force the value $1$ in the {\em residual rule} of f, defined in the paper (of its dual, when D_1(f)=1).
ER  -