EEG Pathology Detection via Clinical Concept Bottleneck Models
- 1Oslo Metropolitan University
Abstract
Deep learning models for electroencephalography (EEG) pathology detection achieve competitive accuracy but offer limited interpretability. In this paper, we introduce concept bottleneck models (CBMs) for EEG pathology detection which use clinical EEG biomarkers computed analytically from the signal as a bottleneck to be used for prediction. Those concepts include band power, spectral ratios, alpha peak frequency and amplitude, hemispheric asymmetry and phase locking values. With the backbone based on shallow convolutional neural network (CNN), we compare a black box baseline with two variants of CBMs. The hybrid variant is a classifier receives a residual projection of the backbone features. The pure variant is a CBM where the classifier receives only the predicted concepts. Models are evaluated on abnormality detection and dementia classification followed by concept prediction quality and leakage analysis. Both CBMs approach the baseline on TUAB (82.7-82.9% vs 83.6%) and are 2-5 percentage points lower on CAUEEG (57.9-60.5% vs 62.7%). The pure CBM exhibits concept fidelity concern where the predicted concepts deviate from their ground truth values. Replacing them with their true values causes severe cost on accuracy by 26 and 22 points on TUAB and CAUEEG. The concept fidelity concern is mitigated by increasing the weight of the concept loss to match the ground truth concepts. the mitigation comes with small accuracy cost on TUAB but a relatively larger cost on CAUEEG. The code of the experiments and full logs are available at https://www.github.com/mhmdrdwn/cbm.
Related
- Integrating Genomic Annotations and Traits Dependencies for single-nucleotide polymorphisms Prioritization with Causal Concept Bottleneck Models
- Bridging the Modality Bottleneck in Pathology MIL through Molecularly Guided Feature Adaptation
- A streamlined proof of concept CRISPR-based environmental biosurveillance platform for the detection of closely related invasive rats
- Systemic Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae Infection with Rhomboid Skin Lesions in a Free-Ranging Short-Beaked Common Dolphin (Delphinus delphis) Stranded in Jeju, Republic of Korea: Post-Mortem Computed Tomography, Pathology and Multi-Tissue Molecular Detection.
- Comparison of anomaly detection and supervised learning for acute myeloid leukemia blast identification: A proof-of-concept study
BibTeX
@misc{radwan2026pathology,
title = {{EEG Pathology Detection via Clinical Concept Bottleneck Models}},
author = {M. Radwan and A. Yazidi and P. G. Lind},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.04.756607},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.04.756607v1},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - EEG Pathology Detection via Clinical Concept Bottleneck Models
AU - M. Radwan
AU - A. Yazidi
AU - P. G. Lind
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/04
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.04.756607
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.04.756607v1
AB - Deep learning models for electroencephalography (EEG) pathology detection achieve competitive accuracy but offer limited interpretability. In this paper, we introduce concept bottleneck models (CBMs) for EEG pathology detection which use clinical EEG biomarkers computed analytically from the signal as a bottleneck to be used for prediction. Those concepts include band power, spectral ratios, alpha peak frequency and amplitude, hemispheric asymmetry and phase locking values. With the backbone based on shallow convolutional neural network (CNN), we compare a black box baseline with two variants of CBMs. The hybrid variant is a classifier receives a residual projection of the backbone features. The pure variant is a CBM where the classifier receives only the predicted concepts. Models are evaluated on abnormality detection and dementia classification followed by concept prediction quality and leakage analysis. Both CBMs approach the baseline on TUAB (82.7-82.9% vs 83.6%) and are 2-5 percentage points lower on CAUEEG (57.9-60.5% vs 62.7%). The pure CBM exhibits concept fidelity concern where the predicted concepts deviate from their ground truth values. Replacing them with their true values causes severe cost on accuracy by 26 and 22 points on TUAB and CAUEEG. The concept fidelity concern is mitigated by increasing the weight of the concept loss to match the ground truth concepts. the mitigation comes with small accuracy cost on TUAB but a relatively larger cost on CAUEEG. The code of the experiments and full logs are available at https://www.github.com/mhmdrdwn/cbm.
ER -