Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

FET fusion proteins reshape splicing factor networks to drive oncogenic alternative splicing

1 more authors
  1. 1Laboratory of Gene Expression and Cancer, GIGA Institute, University of Liege (ULiege), Liege, Belgium

Abstract

Gene fusions involving the FET gene family (FUS, EWSR1, and TAF15) act as drivers of numerous cancer subtypes. The resulting chimeric proteins are widely viewed as aberrant transcriptional regulators that promote malignant transformation through chromatin and enhancer reprogramming. Here, we show that FET fusion oncoproteins also function as regulators of alternative splicing across multiple sarcoma subtypes. Transcriptomic analyses revealed extensive but largely non-overlapping splicing programs driven by the EWSR1::FLI1, EWSR1::WT1, EWSR1::ATF1 and FUS::DDIT3 fusions that nevertheless converged on common oncogenic functions. Fusion-dependent splicing regulation was mechanistically separable from canonical transcriptional activity and was associated with extensive remodeling of cooperative RNA-binding protein (RBP) assemblies on target transcripts. Despite regulating distinct exons, different FET fusions engaged highly similar RBP interaction networks, consistent with a conserved mode of splicing regulation. Transcriptome-wide mapping of RBP occupancy revealed extensive reorganization of local RNA regulatory landscapes following fusion depletion. The requirement of RNA for FET fusion condensate formation, together with the inability of condensation-defective mutants to restore splicing regulation, further supported a role for higher-order assemblies in fusion-dependent alternative splicing (AS) control. Fusion-driven splicing programs stratified Ewing sarcoma patients independently of established clinical covariates, thereby underscoring their clinical relevance. AS of TFDP1 emerged as a common fusion-regulated splicing event required for sarcoma cell fitness and therapeutically actionable using antisense oligonucleotides. Together, our findings establish AS regulation as a conserved function of FET fusion oncoproteins that is mechanistically separable from their canonical transcriptional activity. More broadly, they support a model in which oncogenic fusion proteins can drive malignant phenotypes through large-scale remodeling of RNA regulatory networks.

Related

  1. Alternative splicing of a species- and skeletal muscle-specific microexon diversifies the menu of clathrin heavy chains in mice and rats
    R. Eric Blue, Adam J. Black, Jessica L. Cote +7
    iSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCell biologyCell PressCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. FAM50A promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression via splicing-dependent oncogenic circSDK1- and DUSP22-mediated MAPK/FAK activation.
    Yan Bian, Ye Gao, Xin Chang +7
    Cell discoveryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMCDOAJ
  3. CRISPR-mediated correction of oncogenic AS-NMD in splicing factor mutant cancer
    Preeti Nagar, Md Rafikul Islam, Nirjhor Anuvob Rahman +8
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossrefDOAJEurope PMC
  4. G-Quadruplexes at the ‘Interface’ of Transcription and Alternative Splicing
    Pavel Rubtsov, Julia Khomyakova, Anna Varizhuk
    BiomoleculesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Molecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  5. SRSF1 coordinates transcription and alternative splicing to modulate p53 and genome-maintenance
    Sean Paz, Elena Bisotto, Massimo Caputi
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationbioRxivPMC
BibTeX
@misc{ongena2026fusion,
  title = {{FET fusion proteins reshape splicing factor networks to drive oncogenic alternative splicing}},
  author = {L. Ongena and E. Lucarelli and L. Dubois and J. Bruyr and L. Mao and F. H. Geyer and F. Cidre-Aranaz and T. G. P. Grünewald and A. K. Jayavelu and Y. Zhang and A. Bhinge and D. Vertommen and F. Dequiedt},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.08.28.746988},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.28.746988v2},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - FET fusion proteins reshape splicing factor networks to drive oncogenic alternative splicing
AU  - L. Ongena
AU  - E. Lucarelli
AU  - L. Dubois
AU  - J. Bruyr
AU  - L. Mao
AU  - F. H. Geyer
AU  - F. Cidre-Aranaz
AU  - T. G. P. Grünewald
AU  - A. K. Jayavelu
AU  - Y. Zhang
AU  - A. Bhinge
AU  - D. Vertommen
AU  - F. Dequiedt
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/28
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.08.28.746988
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.28.746988v2
AB  - Gene fusions involving the FET gene family (FUS, EWSR1, and TAF15) act as drivers of numerous cancer subtypes. The resulting chimeric proteins are widely viewed as aberrant transcriptional regulators that promote malignant transformation through chromatin and enhancer reprogramming. Here, we show that FET fusion oncoproteins also function as regulators of alternative splicing across multiple sarcoma subtypes. Transcriptomic analyses revealed extensive but largely non-overlapping splicing programs driven by the EWSR1::FLI1, EWSR1::WT1, EWSR1::ATF1 and FUS::DDIT3 fusions that nevertheless converged on common oncogenic functions. Fusion-dependent splicing regulation was mechanistically separable from canonical transcriptional activity and was associated with extensive remodeling of cooperative RNA-binding protein (RBP) assemblies on target transcripts. Despite regulating distinct exons, different FET fusions engaged highly similar RBP interaction networks, consistent with a conserved mode of splicing regulation. Transcriptome-wide mapping of RBP occupancy revealed extensive reorganization of local RNA regulatory landscapes following fusion depletion. The requirement of RNA for FET fusion condensate formation, together with the inability of condensation-defective mutants to restore splicing regulation, further supported a role for higher-order assemblies in fusion-dependent alternative splicing (AS) control. Fusion-driven splicing programs stratified Ewing sarcoma patients independently of established clinical covariates, thereby underscoring their clinical relevance. AS of TFDP1 emerged as a common fusion-regulated splicing event required for sarcoma cell fitness and therapeutically actionable using antisense oligonucleotides. Together, our findings establish AS regulation as a conserved function of FET fusion oncoproteins that is mechanistically separable from their canonical transcriptional activity. More broadly, they support a model in which oncogenic fusion proteins can drive malignant phenotypes through large-scale remodeling of RNA regulatory networks.
ER  -