Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,869 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Joint Accuracy and Confidentiality in Semantic-Aware Secure Remote Reconstruction

Abstract

In this paper, we consider remote reconstruction over wireless networks when simultaneous accuracy at the legitimate receiver and confidentiality against eavesdropping are required. These two objectives are often treated separately, even though they arise from the same update process and are marginals of a joint reconstruction event. This paper introduces confidential reconstruction accuracy (CRA), a metric to capture the joint event in which the legitimate receiver reconstructs correctly while the eavesdropper fails. Under randomized stationary policies, we develop a three-dimensional stationary analysis and derive closed-form expressions for the long-term average CRA and the optimal transmission probability. The results show that conventional marginal analysis can misidentify the optimal policy and misestimate the achievable simultaneous accuracy-confidentiality performance. They also reveal nontrivial behaviors: more frequent transmissions or better legitimate channels do not necessarily improve joint accurate and confidential reconstruction, and when the eavesdropping channel is strong, improving the legitimate channel alone may be insufficient. Finally, the framework induces the spatial safety boundary in a geofencing setting for secure remote reconstruction.

Related

  1. Secure Joint Source-Channel Coding of Multimodal Semantic Sources
    Denis Kozlov, Mahtab Mirmohseni, Rahim Tafazolli
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  2. Resource-Constrained Semantic-Aware Remote Estimation with Overlapping Sensor Coverage
    Bowen Sun, Nikolaos Pappas
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  3. Legitimate Reconstruction Advantage in Wiretapped Semantics-Aware Remote Monitoring
    Bowen Li, Nikolaos Pappas
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  4. Constructions of Secure Convertible Codes
    Manasa Suresh B P, Vinayak Ramkumar, Myna Vajha
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  5. Progressive-Resolution Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning
    Seyed Mohammad Azimi-Abarghouyi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{li2026joint,
  title = {{Joint Accuracy and Confidentiality in Semantic-Aware Secure Remote Reconstruction}},
  author = {Bowen Li and Nikolaos Pappas},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.00258},
  eprint = {2605.00258},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00258},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Joint Accuracy and Confidentiality in Semantic-Aware Secure Remote Reconstruction
AU  - Bowen Li
AU  - Nikolaos Pappas
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.00258
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00258
AB  - In this paper, we consider remote reconstruction over wireless networks when simultaneous accuracy at the legitimate receiver and confidentiality against eavesdropping are required. These two objectives are often treated separately, even though they arise from the same update process and are marginals of a joint reconstruction event. This paper introduces confidential reconstruction accuracy (CRA), a metric to capture the joint event in which the legitimate receiver reconstructs correctly while the eavesdropper fails. Under randomized stationary policies, we develop a three-dimensional stationary analysis and derive closed-form expressions for the long-term average CRA and the optimal transmission probability. The results show that conventional marginal analysis can misidentify the optimal policy and misestimate the achievable simultaneous accuracy-confidentiality performance. They also reveal nontrivial behaviors: more frequent transmissions or better legitimate channels do not necessarily improve joint accurate and confidential reconstruction, and when the eavesdropping channel is strong, improving the legitimate channel alone may be insufficient. Finally, the framework induces the spatial safety boundary in a geofencing setting for secure remote reconstruction.
ER  -