Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,761 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Kinematic methods of spiral nature identification: limitations and applicability

  • Valeria S Kostiuk1
  • V D Zozulia2,1
  • A A Marchuk3,2
  • A S Gusev1
  • I V Chugunov3,1
  • A A Smirnova4
4 affiliations
  1. 1Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University , Universitetsky pr. 13, 119234 Moscow ,
  2. 2Saint Petersburg State University, The Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics , Universitetsky pr. 28, 198504 St.Petersburg ,
  3. 3Central (Pulkovo) Astronomical Observatory, Russian Academy of Sciences , Pulkovskoye chaussee 65/1, 196140 St. Petersburg ,
  4. 4Special Astrophysical Observatory, Russian Academy of Sciences , Nizhny Arkhyz 369167 ,
Open at sourcePDFDOICite

Abstract

The nature of spiral arms in galaxies remains debated, with several competing formation scenarios, including density waves, kinematic spirals, dynamic spirals, and recurrent modes, that are difficult to distinguish observationally. We tested two kinematic methods — the phase reversal method and the velocity harmonic dominance method — using toy models and mock data from TNG50 simulations. For bar resonances, the phase reversal method is strongly orientation-dependent and yields reliable corotation estimates only when the bar is aligned with the disc minor axis. For spiral arms, the phase reversal method does not always yield reliable results and should be used in tondem with another kinematic method. The velocity harmonic dominance method is more robust: it distinguishes between density wave, kinematic, and dynamic spiral patterns, although it still shows some sensitivity to orientation. Uncertainties in the rotation curve do not strongly affect its results. We also apply both methods to the observed grand-design spiral galaxy NGC 3938 as an illustrative example; the results suggest the presence of multiple spiral modes, consistent with the recurrent modes scenario and this interpretation relies on different indirect evidence. Based on our findings, we propose a strategy for classifying spiral structure in observed galaxies that combines multiple independent tests. Applying this analysis to an extended sample will allow us to validate its predictive power and to investigate the diversity of spiral formation scenarios.

Versions

Related

  1. Stellar ages from [C/N] in giant stars: applicability and limitations
    Giada Casali, Luca Casagrande, Fiorenzo Vincenzo +5
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesSolar & stellar physicsarXiv
  2. Nexae in caverna: The secular evolution of disks via collectively excited, transient spiral structure
    Sharon E. Meidt, Arjen van der Wel
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsGalaxiesCrossref
  3. The Euler Universe: A Relational Phase Framework for Cosmology — Construction, Philosophy, and Stress-Testing of the Spiral U(θ) = e^((λ+i)θ)
    Nicholas Archer Sanders
    PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)Peer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text12 citedCosmologyOpenAlex
  4. Non-LTE radiative transfer models of very luminous sources and their applicability to little red dots, quasi-stars, and similar objects
    Fabrice Martins, Daniel Schaerer, Rui Marques-Chaves
    Astronomy & Astrophysics - A&APeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedSolar & stellar physicsHAL
  5. Large-Scale Spiral Structure of the Milky Way Traced by Young Classical Cepheids
    Z. H. Lin, C. J. Hao, D. J. Liu +5
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesarXiv

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{kostiuk2026kinematic,
  title = {{Kinematic methods of spiral nature identification: limitations and applicability}},
  author = {Valeria S Kostiuk and V D Zozulia and A A Marchuk and A S Gusev and I V Chugunov and A A Smirnova},
  journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/mnras/stag2064},
  url = {https://academic.oup.com/mnras/advance-article/doi/10.1093/mnras/stag2064/9004845},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Kinematic methods of spiral nature identification: limitations and applicability
AU  - Valeria S Kostiuk
AU  - V D Zozulia
AU  - A A Marchuk
AU  - A S Gusev
AU  - I V Chugunov
AU  - A A Smirnova
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
JO  - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
DO  - 10.1093/mnras/stag2064
UR  - https://academic.oup.com/mnras/advance-article/doi/10.1093/mnras/stag2064/9004845
AB  - The nature of spiral arms in galaxies remains debated, with several competing formation scenarios, including density waves, kinematic spirals, dynamic spirals, and recurrent modes, that are difficult to distinguish observationally. We tested two kinematic methods — the phase reversal method and the velocity harmonic dominance method — using toy models and mock data from TNG50 simulations. For bar resonances, the phase reversal method is strongly orientation-dependent and yields reliable corotation estimates only when the bar is aligned with the disc minor axis. For spiral arms, the phase reversal method does not always yield reliable results and should be used in tondem with another kinematic method. The velocity harmonic dominance method is more robust: it distinguishes between density wave, kinematic, and dynamic spiral patterns, although it still shows some sensitivity to orientation. Uncertainties in the rotation curve do not strongly affect its results. We also apply both methods to the observed grand-design spiral galaxy NGC 3938 as an illustrative example; the results suggest the presence of multiple spiral modes, consistent with the recurrent modes scenario and this interpretation relies on different indirect evidence. Based on our findings, we propose a strategy for classifying spiral structure in observed galaxies that combines multiple independent tests. Applying this analysis to an extended sample will allow us to validate its predictive power and to investigate the diversity of spiral formation scenarios.
SN  - 0035-8711
SN  - 1365-2966
ER  -