Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Applied and Computational Topology

Gromov-Wasserstein Bound between Reeb and Mapper Graphs

Abstract

Since its introduction as a computable approximation of the Reeb graph, the Mapper graph has become one of the most popular tools from topological data analysis for performing data visualization and inference. However, finding an appropriate metric (that is, a tractable metric with theoretical guarantees) for comparing Reeb and Mapper graphs, in order to, e.g., quantify the rate of convergence of the Mapper graph to the Reeb graph, is a difficult problem. While several metrics have been proposed in the literature, none is able to incorporate measure information, when data points are sampled according to an underlying probability measure. The resulting Reeb and Mapper graphs are therefore purely deterministic and combinatorial, and substantial effort is thus required to ensure their statistical validity. In this article, we handle this issue by treating Reeb and Mapper graphs as metric measure spaces. This allows us to use Gromov-Wasserstein metrics to compare these graphs directly in order to better incorporate the probability measures that data points are sampled from. Then, we describe the geometry that arises from this perspective, and we derive rates of convergence of the Mapper graph to the Reeb graph in this context. Finally, we showcase the usefulness of such metrics for Reeb and Mapper graphs in a few numerical experiments.

Related

  1. Algebraic realization of stable Poincaré-Reeb graphs
    Enrico Savi
    Revista Matematica ComplutensePeer-reviewedLicence not statedAlgebra & number theoryHAL
  2. Gromov-compactifiability of Wasserstein spaces
    Huajian Jiang, Zhi-Xiang Zhu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  3. Quantitative Stability and Sample Complexity for Regularized Gromov-Wasserstein Distance
    Pengtao Li, Xiaohui Chen
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Dynamic Generalized Gromov-Wasserstein Optimal Transport
    Junda Ying, Zhiwei Zeng, Peijie Zhou +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textBioinformatics & computational biologyOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. A Provably Convergent and Practical Algorithm for Gromov--Wasserstein Optimal Transport
    Ling Liang, Lei Yang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@article{oulhaj2026gromovwasserstein,
  title = {{Gromov-Wasserstein Bound between Reeb and Mapper Graphs}},
  author = {Ziyad Oulhaj and Mathieu Carrière and Bertrand Michel},
  journal = {Journal of Applied and Computational Topology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/s41468-026-00254-y},
  eprint = {2506.02810},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://inria.hal.science/hal-05097643v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Gromov-Wasserstein Bound between Reeb and Mapper Graphs
AU  - Ziyad Oulhaj
AU  - Mathieu Carrière
AU  - Bertrand Michel
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - Journal of Applied and Computational Topology
DO  - 10.1007/s41468-026-00254-y
UR  - https://inria.hal.science/hal-05097643v1
AB  - Since its introduction as a computable approximation of the Reeb graph, the Mapper graph has become one of the most popular tools from topological data analysis for performing data visualization and inference. However, finding an appropriate metric (that is, a tractable metric with theoretical guarantees) for comparing Reeb and Mapper graphs, in order to, e.g., quantify the rate of convergence of the Mapper graph to the Reeb graph, is a difficult problem. While several metrics have been proposed in the literature, none is able to incorporate measure information, when data points are sampled according to an underlying probability measure. The resulting Reeb and Mapper graphs are therefore purely deterministic and combinatorial, and substantial effort is thus required to ensure their statistical validity. In this article, we handle this issue by treating Reeb and Mapper graphs as metric measure spaces. This allows us to use Gromov-Wasserstein metrics to compare these graphs directly in order to better incorporate the probability measures that data points are sampled from. Then, we describe the geometry that arises from this perspective, and we derive rates of convergence of the Mapper graph to the Reeb graph in this context. Finally, we showcase the usefulness of such metrics for Reeb and Mapper graphs in a few numerical experiments.
SN  - 2367-1726
ER  -