Implementing the MATILDA intervention to enhance community participation for older adults with intellectual disability: A feasibility randomised controlled trial and RE-AIM guided process evaluation
7 affiliations
- 1Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland
- 2University College London, England
- 3Volunteer Now, Belfast, Northern Ireland
- 4Ulster University, Derry, Northern Ireland
- 5Camden and Islington Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- 6Compass Advocacy Network, Ballymoney, Ireland
- 7Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
Abstract
Aim: The primary aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and procedures of conducting a randomised controlled trial and to determine whether the prespecified progression criteria for advancing to a full trial were met. Secondary outcomes explored the clinical outcomes, process evaluation and health economics. Methods: This was a two-arm, randomised feasibility study with 1:1 allocation conducted in the UK. The intervention lasted 6-months. Clinical outcome variables (quality of life, anxiety, loneliness) were collated at baseline, 6- and 12-months post intervention. The RE-AIM framework (Acceptability, Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance) was used to undertake the process evaluation. A health economic evaluation was also explored. Results: We recruited 57 participants of our target population of 64 (89%), 28 participants were randomly allocated to MATILDA and 29 to an active control group. Two participants died and one withdrew from the intervention arm prior to commencement of the intervention. We were able to match all 25 participants to a community group, most with a mentor(s). With regards reach and implementation, most older adults with an intellectual disability were still attending their community groups at 6-months (N = 18, 72%) and at 12-months (N = 17, 68%). There was a slight decrease in the anxiety scores for the participants in Matilda over the 6- and 12-months follow-up periods compared to the control group. MATILDA was found to be clearly acceptable and adoptable by the community groups and mentors. There were some challenges identifying and recruiting community groups and getting mentors to complete their questionnaires. Discussion: MATILDA appears to be a promising community-based intervention to support older adults with an intellectual disability that promotes social inclusion, quality of life, and wellbeing. This study advances our empirical knowledge in understanding the contextual factors, mechanisms and outcomes in developing and delivering a community intervention for this population.
Related
- Feasibility and barriers to implementing a nurse-led hand hygiene intervention in intensive care units: a mixed-methods study
- Feasibility and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Health and Wellbeing Intervention for Adults With Mild to Moderate Intellectual Disabilities.
- How often do Australian government-funded interventional trials exclude adults with intellectual disability? A retrospective registry analysis of ANZCTR records, 2022-2024.
- An adaptive technical and behavioral approach for biomarker acquisition in autism with intellectual disability
- Nutraceutical, Nutritional and Phytotherapeutic Interventions for Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Intellectual Disability: Mechanisms and Clinical Evidence
BibTeX
@article{taggart2026implementing,
title = {{Implementing the MATILDA intervention to enhance community participation for older adults with intellectual disability: A feasibility randomised controlled trial and RE-AIM guided process evaluation}},
author = {Laurence Taggart and Allison Campbell and Isobel Doherty and Kim Ensue and Haleemah Ahmed and Andrew Hanna and Lindsay Armstrong and Jiazhou Ding and Brendan Bunting and Assympta Ryan and Ciaran O’Neil and Mike Clarke and Brendan Leahy and Susie Willis and Janet Schofield and Roger Stancliffe and Angela Hassiotis},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0341940},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341940},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Implementing the MATILDA intervention to enhance community participation for older adults with intellectual disability: A feasibility randomised controlled trial and RE-AIM guided process evaluation
AU - Laurence Taggart
AU - Allison Campbell
AU - Isobel Doherty
AU - Kim Ensue
AU - Haleemah Ahmed
AU - Andrew Hanna
AU - Lindsay Armstrong
AU - Jiazhou Ding
AU - Brendan Bunting
AU - Assympta Ryan
AU - Ciaran O’Neil
AU - Mike Clarke
AU - Brendan Leahy
AU - Susie Willis
AU - Janet Schofield
AU - Roger Stancliffe
AU - Angela Hassiotis
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/22
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0341940
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341940
AB - Aim: The primary aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and procedures of conducting a randomised controlled trial and to determine whether the prespecified progression criteria for advancing to a full trial were met. Secondary outcomes explored the clinical outcomes, process evaluation and health economics. Methods: This was a two-arm, randomised feasibility study with 1:1 allocation conducted in the UK. The intervention lasted 6-months. Clinical outcome variables (quality of life, anxiety, loneliness) were collated at baseline, 6- and 12-months post intervention. The RE-AIM framework (Acceptability, Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance) was used to undertake the process evaluation. A health economic evaluation was also explored. Results: We recruited 57 participants of our target population of 64 (89%), 28 participants were randomly allocated to MATILDA and 29 to an active control group. Two participants died and one withdrew from the intervention arm prior to commencement of the intervention. We were able to match all 25 participants to a community group, most with a mentor(s). With regards reach and implementation, most older adults with an intellectual disability were still attending their community groups at 6-months (N = 18, 72%) and at 12-months (N = 17, 68%). There was a slight decrease in the anxiety scores for the participants in Matilda over the 6- and 12-months follow-up periods compared to the control group. MATILDA was found to be clearly acceptable and adoptable by the community groups and mentors. There were some challenges identifying and recruiting community groups and getting mentors to complete their questionnaires. Discussion: MATILDA appears to be a promising community-based intervention to support older adults with an intellectual disability that promotes social inclusion, quality of life, and wellbeing. This study advances our empirical knowledge in understanding the contextual factors, mechanisms and outcomes in developing and delivering a community intervention for this population.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -