Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Bayesian Consensus Calibration of Continuously Evolving IRT Item Banks

Abstract

AI-based item generation and NLP-based prediction of item parameters are producing item banks that are substantially larger, sparser, and more frequently updated than conventional banks. Hierarchical Bayesian item response theory (IRT) is a natural calibration framework for such banks, but the common practice of refitting the entire accumulated response history at each update is costly and can exceed available memory. We describe \emph{consensus calibration}, a divide-and-conquer procedure that calibrates each time period independently and reconstructs the pooled posterior in two layers. First, the posterior draws of each period are mapped to a common metric by a robust characteristic-curve linking (Haebara) that is solved separately for each draw, which propagates the uncertainty of the linking transformation into the linked posteriors. Second, the linked item posteriors are combined as a product of Gaussian densities from which the population prior contributed by each period is removed and a single prior---obtained by consensus across the per-period population posteriors---is reinstated. The correction targets the posterior dispersion, not only its location. As evidence for consensus calibration, we compare it to a pooled single-run analysis on a large operational assessment in terms of item-parameter recovery, an uncertainty-by-exposure diagnostic, and the ability distributions.

Related

  1. Large Language Models Meet Bayesian Optimization: Towards Self-evolving Wireless Digital Twins
    Yingzhuo Sun, Haoyun Li, Ming Xiao +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  2. An Information Freshness-Based Method for Quantum Bayesian Networks in the Consensus-Reaching Process Under Relative Deprivation
    Huagang Tong, Sucheng Fan, Jingzhi Li
    AxiomsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  3. Flexible Transformations for Bayesian Score Calibration
    Adam Bretherton, Joshua J. Bon, David J. Warne +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Rényi-Regularized Flow-Based Variational Inference for Bayesian Calibration
    Exaucé Luweh Adjim Ngarti, Élise Arnaud, Léo Nicoletti +2
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC 4.0Full textStatisticsHALarXiv
  5. Posterior Geometry and Identifiability in Multi-Response Bayesian Calibration
    Anton van Beek, Adam. M Boyce, Will J. Dawson +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{jewsbury2026bayesian,
  title = {{Bayesian Consensus Calibration of Continuously Evolving IRT Item Banks}},
  author = {Paul A. Jewsbury and Steven W. Nydick and Manqian Liao and Siyuan and Chen},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.13590},
  eprint = {2609.13590},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13590},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Bayesian Consensus Calibration of Continuously Evolving IRT Item Banks
AU  - Paul A. Jewsbury
AU  - Steven W. Nydick
AU  - Manqian Liao
AU  - Siyuan
AU  - Chen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/11
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.13590
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13590
AB  - AI-based item generation and NLP-based prediction of item parameters are producing item banks that are substantially larger, sparser, and more frequently updated than conventional banks. Hierarchical Bayesian item response theory (IRT) is a natural calibration framework for such banks, but the common practice of refitting the entire accumulated response history at each update is costly and can exceed available memory. We describe \emph{consensus calibration}, a divide-and-conquer procedure that calibrates each time period independently and reconstructs the pooled posterior in two layers. First, the posterior draws of each period are mapped to a common metric by a robust characteristic-curve linking (Haebara) that is solved separately for each draw, which propagates the uncertainty of the linking transformation into the linked posteriors. Second, the linked item posteriors are combined as a product of Gaussian densities from which the population prior contributed by each period is removed and a single prior---obtained by consensus across the per-period population posteriors---is reinstated. The correction targets the posterior dispersion, not only its location. As evidence for consensus calibration, we compare it to a pooled single-run analysis on a large operational assessment in terms of item-parameter recovery, an uncertainty-by-exposure diagnostic, and the ability distributions.
ER  -