Agreement of markerless and marker-based joint kinetics in team sport-specific change-of-direction movements
Abstract
Markerless (ML) motion capture is a practical alternative to marker-based (MB) systems, yet its ability to estimate joint kinetics during team sport-specific movements remains unclear. This study evaluated the agreement between ML and MB lower extremity joint moment estimates during change-of-direction (COD) tasks. Nineteen team sport athletes performed straight running and four COD movements (45-, 90-, 135-, 180-degrees) at different speeds. Joint moments at the hip, knee, and ankle were computed from synchronized force-plate data and either ML video data (Theia3D) or MB motion-capture data. Agreement was assessed using an extended Bland–Altman approach with linear mixed-effects models for peak joint moments and bootstrapped functional prediction bands for the entire stance phase. Substantial random and systematic differences were observed between systems exceeding the defined threshold of ≤ 10% in relative limits of agreement (LoAs) and in average MB signal range × 100% stance. LoAs for peak joint moments ranged from ± 0.38 Nm/kg at the ankle to ± 1.21 Nm/kg at the hip, indicating that difference between systems was of similar magnitude to, or larger than, the underlying MB-derived peak moments. Relative random differences ranged from 92 to 128% across movement planes. Agreement did not show a consistent pattern across movement directions or direction-specific speed categories. These findings indicate that ML- and MB-derived joint kinetics cannot be used interchangeably.
Related
- Evaluation of a markerless data augmentation algorithm for sports movements
- Feature-dependent agreement between markerless and marker-based motion capture during continuous Taijiquan movement
- Concurrent Validity and Agreement of Viewpoint-Dependent Markerless Motion Tracking in Upper-Limb Assessment: A Validation Against Optoelectronic Motion Capture
- Is Markerless Motion capture accurate enough to identify kinematic risk factors associated with the ACL rupture during high-velocity change of direction? A pilot study on rugby players.
- Spacetime Existence Theory——Why does light travel in a specific direction
BibTeX
@article{helwig2026agreement,
title = {{Agreement of markerless and marker-based joint kinetics in team sport-specific change-of-direction movements}},
author = {Janina Helwig and Jos Vanrenterghem and Daniel Koska and Albert Gollhofer and Steffen Willwacher},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-72910-3},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-72910-3},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Agreement of markerless and marker-based joint kinetics in team sport-specific change-of-direction movements
AU - Janina Helwig
AU - Jos Vanrenterghem
AU - Daniel Koska
AU - Albert Gollhofer
AU - Steffen Willwacher
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
JO - Scientific Reports
DO - 10.1038/s41598-026-72910-3
UR - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-72910-3
AB - Markerless (ML) motion capture is a practical alternative to marker-based (MB) systems, yet its ability to estimate joint kinetics during team sport-specific movements remains unclear. This study evaluated the agreement between ML and MB lower extremity joint moment estimates during change-of-direction (COD) tasks. Nineteen team sport athletes performed straight running and four COD movements (45-, 90-, 135-, 180-degrees) at different speeds. Joint moments at the hip, knee, and ankle were computed from synchronized force-plate data and either ML video data (Theia3D) or MB motion-capture data. Agreement was assessed using an extended Bland–Altman approach with linear mixed-effects models for peak joint moments and bootstrapped functional prediction bands for the entire stance phase. Substantial random and systematic differences were observed between systems exceeding the defined threshold of ≤ 10% in relative limits of agreement (LoAs) and in average MB signal range × 100% stance. LoAs for peak joint moments ranged from ± 0.38 Nm/kg at the ankle to ± 1.21 Nm/kg at the hip, indicating that difference between systems was of similar magnitude to, or larger than, the underlying MB-derived peak moments. Relative random differences ranged from 92 to 128% across movement planes. Agreement did not show a consistent pattern across movement directions or direction-specific speed categories. These findings indicate that ML- and MB-derived joint kinetics cannot be used interchangeably.
SN - 2045-2322
ER -