Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Sink vs. diagonal patterns as mechanisms for attention switch and oversmoothing prevention

Abstract

This paper studies the role of sinks and diagonal patterns as attention switch and anti-oversmoothing mechanisms. We analyze geometric conditions under which sinks can be represented, showing a necessary alignment between the embedding of the sink and all other embeddings. Next, we refine the current understanding of the role of sinks in oversmoothing prevention: we specify the conditions under which dense attention is expected to smooth more than sparse attention, and empirically verify that such conditions are often satisfied in practice. We further prove an equivalence between sinks and hard attention switch, in which the output of the attention is identically 0. Finally, we relax the hard attention switch by allowing token self-communication: we provide a quantitative comparison of the costs of representing sinks vs.\ diagonal patterns, showing why sinks are favored in pretrained transformers. The introduction and analysis of diagonal patterns and the generalization of the attention switch close the gap between what oversmoothing prevention requires and what sinks provide, while also establishing when and why attention layers act like MLPs if token communication is not necessary.

Related

  1. Kernel-based Interpolatory Methods for Context Compression of Attention Mechanisms
    Michel Fabrice Serret, Laura Grigori
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  2. Off-diagonal Ramsey numbers
    Domagoj Bradač
    arXiv (Cornell University)PreprintLicence not statedFull text19 citedCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsOpenAlex
  3. Concept lattices of Q-relations via diagonal and back-diagonal categories
    Hongliang Lai, Bo Pang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  4. Diagonal F-threshold of binomial edge ideals
    Giancarlo Rinaldo, Francesco Romeo
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. The Diagonal of a Regular Pentagon
    Dan McQuillan
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{sukenik2026sink,
  title = {{Sink vs. diagonal patterns as mechanisms for attention switch and oversmoothing prevention}},
  author = {Peter Súkeník and Cristina López Amado and Christoph H. Lampert and Marco Mondelli},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.08453},
  eprint = {2605.08453},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08453},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sink vs. diagonal patterns as mechanisms for attention switch and oversmoothing prevention
AU  - Peter Súkeník
AU  - Cristina López Amado
AU  - Christoph H. Lampert
AU  - Marco Mondelli
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.08453
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08453
AB  - This paper studies the role of sinks and diagonal patterns as attention switch and anti-oversmoothing mechanisms. We analyze geometric conditions under which sinks can be represented, showing a necessary alignment between the embedding of the sink and all other embeddings. Next, we refine the current understanding of the role of sinks in oversmoothing prevention: we specify the conditions under which dense attention is expected to smooth more than sparse attention, and empirically verify that such conditions are often satisfied in practice. We further prove an equivalence between sinks and hard attention switch, in which the output of the attention is identically 0. Finally, we relax the hard attention switch by allowing token self-communication: we provide a quantitative comparison of the costs of representing sinks vs.\ diagonal patterns, showing why sinks are favored in pretrained transformers. The introduction and analysis of diagonal patterns and the generalization of the attention switch close the gap between what oversmoothing prevention requires and what sinks provide, while also establishing when and why attention layers act like MLPs if token communication is not necessary.
ER  -