PDE-OBS: Controlled Evaluation Across Observation Patterns
Abstract
Physical-field reconstruction and forecasting depend on both measurement density and spatial layout, yet evaluation under a single observation pattern does not characterize performance when that pattern changes. We introduce PDE-OBS, an integrated benchmarking platform spanning numerical data generation, model training, and inference and evaluation under varying observation conditions. It combines 560,000 fields and trajectories from seven partial differential equation families with configurable observation operators and seven adapted baseline methods for stationary reconstruction and short-horizon forecasting. Separating observation construction from physical records allows users to specify parameterized patterns and deterministic mixtures for training and testing while preserving prediction targets and data splits. The evaluation protocol uses references trained for each test pattern to compare models on identical test observations and targets, alongside equal-count groups for spatial-layout comparisons. On a 14,000-record subset, we evaluate 441 trained models under nine test patterns, yielding 3,969 evaluations. Mean cross-pattern error exceeds mean matched-pattern error in all 49 PDE-method pairs, and this finding persists in a configuration-matched subset of 117 models. Denser test observations do not consistently reduce error for a fixed model. Mixed-pattern training on five completed pairs reduces large single-pattern transfer errors, although destination-trained references usually remain more accurate. Together, the benchmark and findings support systematic evaluation of observation-pattern sensitivity and provide a reusable workflow for developing methods under changing measurement conditions. Code: https://github.com/ru1ch3n/PDE-OBS.
Related
- In situ observation of faceted and branched eutectic growth patterns during directional solidification of thin Al–Si samples
- Experimental observation of Higgs oscillations and their power-law decay across pairing regimes in a cavity QED quantum simulator
- Economic Corridor Detection from Multi-Source Earth Observation and Commercial Geospatial Data Across Nigeria's Kilometre-Scale Grid
- Experienced partisan segregation across patterns of mobility behavior in US cities
- Entangled Merged Pairs: The Observation-Boundary Principle
BibTeX
@misc{xu2026pdeobs,
title = {{PDE-OBS: Controlled Evaluation Across Observation Patterns}},
author = {Ruichen Xu and Siyao Wang and Fang Wan and Jiacheng Qiu and Wenhan Gao and Jiaxing Zhang and Linsey Pang and Ravid Shwartz-Ziv and Yann LeCun and Yuefan Deng},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.36521},
eprint = {2609.36521},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36521},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - PDE-OBS: Controlled Evaluation Across Observation Patterns
AU - Ruichen Xu
AU - Siyao Wang
AU - Fang Wan
AU - Jiacheng Qiu
AU - Wenhan Gao
AU - Jiaxing Zhang
AU - Linsey Pang
AU - Ravid Shwartz-Ziv
AU - Yann LeCun
AU - Yuefan Deng
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.36521
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36521
AB - Physical-field reconstruction and forecasting depend on both measurement density and spatial layout, yet evaluation under a single observation pattern does not characterize performance when that pattern changes. We introduce PDE-OBS, an integrated benchmarking platform spanning numerical data generation, model training, and inference and evaluation under varying observation conditions. It combines 560,000 fields and trajectories from seven partial differential equation families with configurable observation operators and seven adapted baseline methods for stationary reconstruction and short-horizon forecasting. Separating observation construction from physical records allows users to specify parameterized patterns and deterministic mixtures for training and testing while preserving prediction targets and data splits. The evaluation protocol uses references trained for each test pattern to compare models on identical test observations and targets, alongside equal-count groups for spatial-layout comparisons. On a 14,000-record subset, we evaluate 441 trained models under nine test patterns, yielding 3,969 evaluations. Mean cross-pattern error exceeds mean matched-pattern error in all 49 PDE-method pairs, and this finding persists in a configuration-matched subset of 117 models. Denser test observations do not consistently reduce error for a fixed model. Mixed-pattern training on five completed pairs reduces large single-pattern transfer errors, although destination-trained references usually remain more accurate. Together, the benchmark and findings support systematic evaluation of observation-pattern sensitivity and provide a reusable workflow for developing methods under changing measurement conditions. Code: https://github.com/ru1ch3n/PDE-OBS.
ER -