Methodologies for studying depression in persons with tuberculosis: A scoping review
7 affiliations
- 1Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- 2World Alliance for Lung and Intensive Care Medicine in Uganda (WALIMU), Kampala, Uganda
- 3Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- 4Welch Medical Library, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- 5Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- 6Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- 7Center for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
Abstract
Depression is prevalent among people with tuberculosis (PWTB) and negatively affects diagnosis, treatment adherence, and clinical outcomes. However, the methodological approaches used to study depression among PWTB have not been systematically mapped. This scoping review aimed to evaluate methodologies used to study depression among PWTB and identify gaps in methodological approaches. We conducted a systematic scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Nine databases were searched without date restrictions. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Inclusion criteria included primary, peer-reviewed, research studies that examined depression among PWTB, and reported outcomes related to TB and depression. Data were extracted on study characteristics, TB population, depression measurement tools, treatment approaches, and implementation considerations. Findings were organized using Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. A total of 184 studies met inclusion criteria. Research was dominated by cross-sectional designs (65%), with fewer cohort studies (17%) and only eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs, 4%). The RCTs primarily evaluated psychological interventions that demonstrated modest improvements in depressive symptoms or TB-related outcomes. Depression was overwhelmingly assessed using screening tools with only 28 studies (15%) using a diagnostic interview or clinical criteria. None evaluated accuracy of any screening or diagnostic tool. Studies were geographically clustered, with more than one-third conducted in India or China. Implementation barriers to integrated TB and depression care included workforce shortages and stigma; facilitators included task-shifting and embedding screening into routine workflows. No studies reported on maintenance or long-term sustainability of depression care within TB programs. Existing research on depression among PWTB is largely cross-sectional, relies heavily on screening tools, and rarely evaluates interventions or their sustainability. Expanding population and geographic coverage, incorporating longitudinal designs and diagnostic evaluation, and strengthening implementation and maintenance research are critical for developing sustainable, integrated approaches to depression care within TB services.
Related
- Effectiveness of integrated tuberculosis and depression treatment led by non-specialist health workers versus standard care among persons with tuberculosis in a low-resource setting: A quasi-experimental non-randomized controlled trial
- Sarcopenia in Informal Caregivers of Persons Living with Dementia: A Scoping Review
- Culturally Sensitive End-of-Life Care for Persons with Dementia: A Global Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework
- Methodologies used in the development of the international classification of functioning, disability and health core sets: a systematic scoping review
- Artificial intelligence in eating disorder research: a scoping review with bibliometric analysis of trends, methodologies, and translational readiness (2016-2025).
BibTeX
@article{gupta2026methodologies,
title = {{Methodologies for studying depression in persons with tuberculosis: A scoping review}},
author = {Amanda J. Gupta and Patricia Turimumahoro and Fulera Salami and Ayden Brennan and David Jacoby and Sheeba Ibidunni and Lori Rosman and Jonathan E. Golub and David W. Dowdy},
journal = {PLOS Global Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pgph.0007388},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007388},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Methodologies for studying depression in persons with tuberculosis: A scoping review
AU - Amanda J. Gupta
AU - Patricia Turimumahoro
AU - Fulera Salami
AU - Ayden Brennan
AU - David Jacoby
AU - Sheeba Ibidunni
AU - Lori Rosman
AU - Jonathan E. Golub
AU - David W. Dowdy
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/28
JO - PLOS Global Public Health
DO - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0007388
UR - https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007388
AB - Depression is prevalent among people with tuberculosis (PWTB) and negatively affects diagnosis, treatment adherence, and clinical outcomes. However, the methodological approaches used to study depression among PWTB have not been systematically mapped. This scoping review aimed to evaluate methodologies used to study depression among PWTB and identify gaps in methodological approaches. We conducted a systematic scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Nine databases were searched without date restrictions. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Inclusion criteria included primary, peer-reviewed, research studies that examined depression among PWTB, and reported outcomes related to TB and depression. Data were extracted on study characteristics, TB population, depression measurement tools, treatment approaches, and implementation considerations. Findings were organized using Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. A total of 184 studies met inclusion criteria. Research was dominated by cross-sectional designs (65%), with fewer cohort studies (17%) and only eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs, 4%). The RCTs primarily evaluated psychological interventions that demonstrated modest improvements in depressive symptoms or TB-related outcomes. Depression was overwhelmingly assessed using screening tools with only 28 studies (15%) using a diagnostic interview or clinical criteria. None evaluated accuracy of any screening or diagnostic tool. Studies were geographically clustered, with more than one-third conducted in India or China. Implementation barriers to integrated TB and depression care included workforce shortages and stigma; facilitators included task-shifting and embedding screening into routine workflows. No studies reported on maintenance or long-term sustainability of depression care within TB programs. Existing research on depression among PWTB is largely cross-sectional, relies heavily on screening tools, and rarely evaluates interventions or their sustainability. Expanding population and geographic coverage, incorporating longitudinal designs and diagnostic evaluation, and strengthening implementation and maintenance research are critical for developing sustainable, integrated approaches to depression care within TB services.
SN - 2767-3375
ER -