Statistical Inference for Bivariate Functional Causal Discovery
Abstract
Causal discovery methods aim to determine the causal direction between variables using observational data. Functional causal discovery methods rely on structural and distributional assumptions to determine directionality but typically lack statistical inference. This paper reviews the statistical guarantees of existing functional causal discovery methods in theory, software, and applied use, highlighting a key gap: the absence of a unified inferential framework that applies broadly across model classes. As a first step toward addressing this gap, we formalize a test-based approach for bivariate causal discovery by repurposing goodness-of-fit and independence tests within a hypothesis-testing framework. Because directionality is determined through two disjoint hypothesis tests, corresponding to four causal discovery outcomes, the approach provides explicit uncertainty quantification and diagnostic insight into assumption violations. Resampling is further used to estimate the rates of causal discovery outcomes, offering an additional layer of inference. We demonstrate the use and behavior of our inferential framework through simulations that vary the degree of assumption violation, as well as through real-data applications. We conclude with practical lessons and recommendations for advancing statistical guarantees in functional causal discovery.
Related
- Causal Discovery beyond Conditional Independence: Identifiability, Algorithms, and Statistical Inference for Directed Acyclic and Cyclic Graphs
- Statistical Inference for Causal Discovery under Selection and Latent Variables via Single-Target Interventions
- Statistical inference for quantile correlation regression with bivariate outcomes
- The Statistical Cost of Causal Discovery with Feedback
- Causal discovery and inference in COVID-19: A multiscale longitudinal analysis using mixtures of DAGs
BibTeX
@misc{prakash2026statistical,
title = {{Statistical Inference for Bivariate Functional Causal Discovery}},
author = {Shreya Prakash and Fan Xia and Elena A. Erosheva},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.16562},
eprint = {2609.16562},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16562},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Statistical Inference for Bivariate Functional Causal Discovery
AU - Shreya Prakash
AU - Fan Xia
AU - Elena A. Erosheva
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.16562
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16562
AB - Causal discovery methods aim to determine the causal direction between variables using observational data. Functional causal discovery methods rely on structural and distributional assumptions to determine directionality but typically lack statistical inference. This paper reviews the statistical guarantees of existing functional causal discovery methods in theory, software, and applied use, highlighting a key gap: the absence of a unified inferential framework that applies broadly across model classes. As a first step toward addressing this gap, we formalize a test-based approach for bivariate causal discovery by repurposing goodness-of-fit and independence tests within a hypothesis-testing framework. Because directionality is determined through two disjoint hypothesis tests, corresponding to four causal discovery outcomes, the approach provides explicit uncertainty quantification and diagnostic insight into assumption violations. Resampling is further used to estimate the rates of causal discovery outcomes, offering an additional layer of inference. We demonstrate the use and behavior of our inferential framework through simulations that vary the degree of assumption violation, as well as through real-data applications. We conclude with practical lessons and recommendations for advancing statistical guarantees in functional causal discovery.
ER -