Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 51 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Hamiltonian Interface Dynamics for Reduced-Order Optimization of Incompressible Mixing

Abstract

We develop a reduced-order framework for optimizing mixing in two-dimensional incompressible flows. Instead of optimizing the full transport PDE, the method maximizes the length of advected material interfaces, leading to a Hamiltonian control problem with a finite spatial basis based on parametrized stream functions. We derive the continuous adjoint equations and reduced gradients, and discretize the forward and adjoint dynamics with the implicit midpoint rule. The resulting discrete adjoint is algebraically consistent with the derivative of the fully discrete objective when the implicit equations are solved exactly. The approach applies to bounded two-dimensional domains with sufficiently regular finite-dimensional stream-function parametrizations. Numerical experiments on cellular-flow and Doswell frontogenesis benchmarks show interface stretching and mix-norm decay over the simulated horizons. In four comparisons, the interface runs have lower recorded optimization times, whereas the Sobolev controls attain smaller terminal mix-norms. The different constraints, stopping rules and timing scopes preclude an equal-accuracy speedup claim.

Related

  1. Stroh--Hamiltonian Framework for Modeling Incompressible Poroelastic Materials
    Kinza Arshad, Vincenzo Tibullo
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMathematical physicsFluid dynamicsarXiv
  2. A Comparative Study of Finite-Volume-based Coupled and Segregated Reduced-Order Models for Incompressible Flows in Parametrized Domains
    Andrea Buffolini, Davide Oberto, Gianluigi Rozza
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingFluid dynamicsarXiv
  3. Well-posedness of Strong Solutions for a Thermodynamically Consistent Diffuse-interface Model for Incompressible Two-phase Flows with a Soluble Surfactant
    Maurizio Grasselli, Bohan Ouyang, Hao Wu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  4. A simple derivation of the zero-temperature BCS functional from the reduced BCS Hamiltonian
    Christian Hainzl, Riccardo Panza
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textMathematical physicsCondensed matterarXiv
  5. Dynamics of helical vortex filaments in nonviscous incompressible flows
    Martin Donati, Christophe Lacave, Évelyne Miot
    Bulletin de la Société mathématique de FrancePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text12 citedGeneral mathematicsOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{li2026hamiltonian,
  title = {{Hamiltonian Interface Dynamics for Reduced-Order Optimization of Incompressible Mixing}},
  author = {Ziqian Li and Enrique Zuazua},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.04688},
  eprint = {2605.04688},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04688},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Hamiltonian Interface Dynamics for Reduced-Order Optimization of Incompressible Mixing
AU  - Ziqian Li
AU  - Enrique Zuazua
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.04688
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04688
AB  - We develop a reduced-order framework for optimizing mixing in two-dimensional incompressible flows. Instead of optimizing the full transport PDE, the method maximizes the length of advected material interfaces, leading to a Hamiltonian control problem with a finite spatial basis based on parametrized stream functions. We derive the continuous adjoint equations and reduced gradients, and discretize the forward and adjoint dynamics with the implicit midpoint rule. The resulting discrete adjoint is algebraically consistent with the derivative of the fully discrete objective when the implicit equations are solved exactly. The approach applies to bounded two-dimensional domains with sufficiently regular finite-dimensional stream-function parametrizations. Numerical experiments on cellular-flow and Doswell frontogenesis benchmarks show interface stretching and mix-norm decay over the simulated horizons. In four comparisons, the interface runs have lower recorded optimization times, whereas the Sobolev controls attain smaller terminal mix-norms. The different constraints, stopping rules and timing scopes preclude an equal-accuracy speedup claim.
ER  -