Global patterns of fish–macrocrustacean interactions in freshwater environments: a systematic review
Abstract
1. Understanding species interactions is central to ecology, yet they remain one of the least documented dimensions of biodiversity (the Eltonian shortfall). Most studies have focused on terrestrial vertebrates, while aquatic vertebrates and invertebrates are still poorly understood. Here, we assessed broad patterns in the published literature on interactions between fishes and macrocrustaceans in freshwater ecosystems, identifying the main interaction types, habitat, and major geographical and taxonomic gaps. 2. We conducted a systematic literature review using the Scopus database, including articles published up to December 2025, and identified 96 eligible studies conducted in freshwater environments. We classified studies according to interaction type, habitat, country and taxonomic group, and quantified research effort through number of publications. 3. The retrieved literature focused primarily on predation, followed by parasitism, competition, and commensalism, and was conducted mainly in streams, lakes and rivers, whereas wetlands were markedly underrepresented. In absolute terms, studies were concentrated in the United States, Brazil, and Canada. When publication counts were standardised by national land area, the highest values were recorded for Trinidad and Tobago, Puerto Rico, and Czechia. Most studies involved native fishes and native macrocrustaceans, although interactions between native fishes and non-native macrocrustaceans formed the second most frequent category. 4. These patterns may reflect historical, methodological, and ecological biases, including the predominance of trophic approaches, the greater practical accessibility (e.g., logistical issues) of certain habitats, and the influence of established model systems. 5. Our results highlight a pronounced Eltonian shortfall in freshwater ecosystems. Expanding research across neglected habitats, interaction types, and taxa, as well as conducting more direct field observation studies, will be essential to improve our understanding of biodiversity interaction dynamics and predictions of ecological responses to global environmental change.
Related
- Joint QTL mapping reveals patterns of pleiotropy across structured environments in budding yeast
- Population dynamics in extreme environments: shared histories of strong selection lead to predictable patterns across separate high-elevation populations of small mammals
- Antimicrobial resistance patterns reveal widespread multidrug-resistance among Vibrio species in shrimp hatchery environments of Bangladesh
- The rhythm of the night: Assessing temporal variation of activity patterns in arhythmic environments from field data
- Biotic interactions biogeography: A framework for understanding how species interactions shape biodiversity patterns across scales
BibTeX
@misc{mosna2026global,
title = {{Global patterns of fish–macrocrustacean interactions in freshwater environments: a systematic review}},
author = {Esli Emanoel Domingues Mosna and Josie South and Jansen Zuanon and Alison Wunderlich and Célio Magalhães and Marcelo Antonio Amaro Pinheiro and João Henrique Alliprandini Costa},
howpublished = {EcoEvoRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.32942/x2kq4n},
url = {https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/14953/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Global patterns of fish–macrocrustacean interactions in freshwater environments: a systematic review
AU - Esli Emanoel Domingues Mosna
AU - Josie South
AU - Jansen Zuanon
AU - Alison Wunderlich
AU - Célio Magalhães
AU - Marcelo Antonio Amaro Pinheiro
AU - João Henrique Alliprandini Costa
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/14
PB - EcoEvoRxiv
DO - 10.32942/x2kq4n
UR - https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/14953/
AB - 1. Understanding species interactions is central to ecology, yet they remain one of the least documented dimensions of biodiversity (the Eltonian shortfall). Most studies have focused on terrestrial vertebrates, while aquatic vertebrates and invertebrates are still poorly understood. Here, we assessed broad patterns in the published literature on interactions between fishes and macrocrustaceans in freshwater ecosystems, identifying the main interaction types, habitat, and major geographical and taxonomic gaps. 2. We conducted a systematic literature review using the Scopus database, including articles published up to December 2025, and identified 96 eligible studies conducted in freshwater environments. We classified studies according to interaction type, habitat, country and taxonomic group, and quantified research effort through number of publications. 3. The retrieved literature focused primarily on predation, followed by parasitism, competition, and commensalism, and was conducted mainly in streams, lakes and rivers, whereas wetlands were markedly underrepresented. In absolute terms, studies were concentrated in the United States, Brazil, and Canada. When publication counts were standardised by national land area, the highest values were recorded for Trinidad and Tobago, Puerto Rico, and Czechia. Most studies involved native fishes and native macrocrustaceans, although interactions between native fishes and non-native macrocrustaceans formed the second most frequent category. 4. These patterns may reflect historical, methodological, and ecological biases, including the predominance of trophic approaches, the greater practical accessibility (e.g., logistical issues) of certain habitats, and the influence of established model systems. 5. Our results highlight a pronounced Eltonian shortfall in freshwater ecosystems. Expanding research across neglected habitats, interaction types, and taxa, as well as conducting more direct field observation studies, will be essential to improve our understanding of biodiversity interaction dynamics and predictions of ecological responses to global environmental change.
ER -