Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCJournal of Dental Research

Scoping Review of Oral Health-Related Birth Cohort Studies: Toward a Global Consortium

Abstract

The multidisciplinary nature and long duration of birth cohort studies allow investigation of the relationship between general and oral health and indicate the most appropriate stages in life to intervene. To date, the worldwide distribution of oral health-related birth cohort studies (OHRBCSs) has not been mapped, and a synthesis of information on methodological characteristics and outcomes is not available. We mapped published literature on OHRBCSs, describing their oral health-related data and methodological aspects. A 3-step search strategy was adopted to identify published studies using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and OVID databases. Studies with baseline data collection during pregnancy or within the first year of life or linked future oral health data to exposures during either of these 2 life stages were included. Studies examining only mothers' oral health and specific populations were excluded. In total, 1,721 articles were suitable for initial screening of titles and abstracts, and 528 articles were included in the review, identifying 120 unique OHRBCSs from 34 countries in all continents. The review comprised literature from the mid-1940s to the 21st century. Fifty-four percent of the OHRBCSs started from 2000 onward, and 75% of the cohorts were from high-income and only 2 from low-income countries. The participation rate between the baseline and the last oral health follow-up varied between 7% and 93%. Ten cohorts that included interventions were mostly from 2000 and with fewer than 1,000 participants. Seven data-linkage cohorts focused mostly on upstream characteristics and biological aspects. The most frequent clinical assessment was dental caries, widely presented as decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT/dmft). Periodontal conditions were primarily applied as isolated outcomes or as part of a classification system. Socioeconomic classification, ethnicity, and country- or language-specific assessment tools varied across countries. Harmonizing definitions will allow combining data from different studies, adding considerable strength to data analyses; this will be facilitated by forming a global consortium.

Related

  1. Functional brain activity in cancer-related cognitive impairment: a scoping review of EEG studies
    Barbara Johanne Thomas Nordhjem, Laura Maria Toftekær Rothschild, Clotilde Rose Honoré +3
    Frontiers in human neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  2. Measuring sugar intake in oral health birth cohort studies: a scoping review
    Shilpa Sarawagi, Karla Gambetta-Tessini, Silas Alves-Costa +3
    Frontiers in NutritionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  3. The Global Consortium of Oral Health Birth Cohort Studies—GLOBICS
    K.G. Peres, G.G. Nascimento, S. Sarawagi +31
    Journal of Dental ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC3 citedGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  4. Physiological and health-related effects of 5G-relevant radiofrequency fields: A systematic review of experimental studies in humans and mammals
    Lambert Bodewein, Dagmar Dechent, Tanja Emonds +8
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCell biologyZoology & animal behaviourPLOSPMC
  5. Methodological lineages of concept analysis and mapping of reporting elements in nursing and health-related disciplines: A scoping review protocol
    Sijing Peng, Min Wang, Peili Xu +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceClinical trials & evidence synthesisPLOSEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{peres2026scoping,
  title = {{Scoping Review of Oral Health-Related Birth Cohort Studies: Toward a Global Consortium}},
  author = {K.G. Peres and G.G. Nascimento and A. Gupta and A. Singh and L. Schertel Cassiano and A.J. Rugg-Gunn},
  journal = {Journal of Dental Research},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1177/00220345211062475},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05791956v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Scoping Review of Oral Health-Related Birth Cohort Studies: Toward a Global Consortium
AU  - K.G. Peres
AU  - G.G. Nascimento
AU  - A. Gupta
AU  - A. Singh
AU  - L. Schertel Cassiano
AU  - A.J. Rugg-Gunn
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/11
JO  - Journal of Dental Research
DO  - 10.1177/00220345211062475
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05791956v1
AB  - The multidisciplinary nature and long duration of birth cohort studies allow investigation of the relationship between general and oral health and indicate the most appropriate stages in life to intervene. To date, the worldwide distribution of oral health-related birth cohort studies (OHRBCSs) has not been mapped, and a synthesis of information on methodological characteristics and outcomes is not available. We mapped published literature on OHRBCSs, describing their oral health-related data and methodological aspects. A 3-step search strategy was adopted to identify published studies using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and OVID databases. Studies with baseline data collection during pregnancy or within the first year of life or linked future oral health data to exposures during either of these 2 life stages were included. Studies examining only mothers' oral health and specific populations were excluded. In total, 1,721 articles were suitable for initial screening of titles and abstracts, and 528 articles were included in the review, identifying 120 unique OHRBCSs from 34 countries in all continents. The review comprised literature from the mid-1940s to the 21st century. Fifty-four percent of the OHRBCSs started from 2000 onward, and 75% of the cohorts were from high-income and only 2 from low-income countries. The participation rate between the baseline and the last oral health follow-up varied between 7% and 93%. Ten cohorts that included interventions were mostly from 2000 and with fewer than 1,000 participants. Seven data-linkage cohorts focused mostly on upstream characteristics and biological aspects. The most frequent clinical assessment was dental caries, widely presented as decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT/dmft). Periodontal conditions were primarily applied as isolated outcomes or as part of a classification system. Socioeconomic classification, ethnicity, and country- or language-specific assessment tools varied across countries. Harmonizing definitions will allow combining data from different studies, adding considerable strength to data analyses; this will be facilitated by forming a global consortium.
SN  - 0022-0345
ER  -