Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0In Vivo

Prostate-directed Radiotherapy in Selected Patients With Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Real-world Case Series

  1. 1Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
  2. 2Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan

Abstract

Background/Aim: Prostate-directed radiotherapy (RT) improves outcomes in selected patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), particularly those with low metastatic burden. However, real-world information regarding its use after response to systemic therapy remains limited. This study describes the treatment characteristics, safety, and clinical course of selected patients with mCSPC who received prostate-directed RT.

Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed an institutional RT database containing 396 patients who initiated prostate-directed RT between April 2015 and March 2026. Thirteen patients had mCSPC at RT initiation and were included. Prostate-directed RT was considered after a marked prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline and confirmation of no radiographic progression during first-line systemic therapy; no prespecified PSA threshold was used. Patient characteristics, RT details, RT-related adverse events, and clinical outcomes after RT completion were evaluated.

Results: Eight patients had low-volume and five had high-volume disease. The median interval from initiation of first-line systemic therapy to RT was 8.4 months. The median PSA decline before RT was 99.9% (interquartile range=98.9-99.9%), and the median PSA level before RT was 0.028 ng/ml. All patients received intensity-modulated RT, and residual metastatic lesions were included in the RT target volume in six patients. All patients completed RT. No grade ≥2 acute genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity was observed, and no late RT-related toxicity occurred among the 11 patients evaluable for late toxicity. During follow-up (median, 39.6 months) after RT, four patients developed castration-resistant disease and four experienced radiographic progression. No post-RT local events or prostate cancer-specific deaths occurred; one patient died of an unrelated cause.

Conclusion: In this small, highly selected cohort of patients demonstrating favorable initial responses to systemic therapy, prostate-directed RT was feasible and well tolerated, with no grade ≥2 acute RT-related toxicity, no late toxicity among evaluable patients, and no local events. Comparative efficacy cannot be determined because of the retrospective design, small sample size, and absence of a non-RT control group.

Related

  1. Real-World Early Prostate-Specific Antigen Response Comparison Among Patients with Metastatic Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated with Apalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in the United States.
    Benjamin Lowentritt, Mehmet A Bilen, Sabree Burbage +6
    Journal of health economics and outcomes researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCPMC
  2. Predictors of guideline-concordant treatment intensification in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: an explainable machine learning study
    Emmanuel Barton Odro, James Bychinski, Ted Van Alstyne +9
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefPMC
  3. Real‐World Overall Survival With Abiraterone Acetate and Enzalutamide in Patients With Chemotherapy‐Naïve Metastatic Castration‐Resistant Prostate Cancer From the Flatiron Electronic Health Records Database
    Daniel J. George, Jasmina I. Ivanova, Maëlys Touya +6
    Cancer medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Immune biomarkers of response and resistance to ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
    Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, Christopher R. Cabanski, Alexandra Drakaki +15
    Science advancesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
  5. Niraparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and DNA repair gene defects (GALAHAD): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial
    Matthew Smith, Howard Scher, Shahneen Sandhu +129
    Lancet OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND175 citedOncologyHAL
BibTeX
@article{furubayashi2026prostatedirected,
  title = {{Prostate-directed Radiotherapy in Selected Patients With Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Real-world Case Series}},
  author = {NOBUKI FURUBAYASHI and TAKAAKI NAKASHIMA and RYUJI UEHARA and TAKEHITO KOJIMA and YASUHIRO NAKANO and AKARI KATAOKA and MADOKA ABE and TAKAHITO NEGISHI},
  journal = {In Vivo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.21873/invivo.14520},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14520},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Prostate-directed Radiotherapy in Selected Patients With Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Real-world Case Series
AU  - NOBUKI FURUBAYASHI
AU  - TAKAAKI NAKASHIMA
AU  - RYUJI UEHARA
AU  - TAKEHITO KOJIMA
AU  - YASUHIRO NAKANO
AU  - AKARI KATAOKA
AU  - MADOKA ABE
AU  - TAKAHITO NEGISHI
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
JO  - In Vivo
DO  - 10.21873/invivo.14520
UR  - https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14520
AB  - Background/Aim: Prostate-directed radiotherapy (RT) improves outcomes in selected patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), particularly those with low metastatic burden. However, real-world information regarding its use after response to systemic therapy remains limited. This study describes the treatment characteristics, safety, and clinical course of selected patients with mCSPC who received prostate-directed RT.  Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed an institutional RT database containing 396 patients who initiated prostate-directed RT between April 2015 and March 2026. Thirteen patients had mCSPC at RT initiation and were included. Prostate-directed RT was considered after a marked prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline and confirmation of no radiographic progression during first-line systemic therapy; no prespecified PSA threshold was used. Patient characteristics, RT details, RT-related adverse events, and clinical outcomes after RT completion were evaluated.  Results: Eight patients had low-volume and five had high-volume disease. The median interval from initiation of first-line systemic therapy to RT was 8.4 months. The median PSA decline before RT was 99.9% (interquartile range=98.9-99.9%), and the median PSA level before RT was 0.028 ng/ml. All patients received intensity-modulated RT, and residual metastatic lesions were included in the RT target volume in six patients. All patients completed RT. No grade ≥2 acute genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity was observed, and no late RT-related toxicity occurred among the 11 patients evaluable for late toxicity. During follow-up (median, 39.6 months) after RT, four patients developed castration-resistant disease and four experienced radiographic progression. No post-RT local events or prostate cancer-specific deaths occurred; one patient died of an unrelated cause.  Conclusion: In this small, highly selected cohort of patients demonstrating favorable initial responses to systemic therapy, prostate-directed RT was feasible and well tolerated, with no grade ≥2 acute RT-related toxicity, no late toxicity among evaluable patients, and no local events. Comparative efficacy cannot be determined because of the retrospective design, small sample size, and absence of a non-RT control group.
SN  - 0258-851X
SN  - 1791-7549
ER  -