Grade- and programme-related differences in career planning competence among undergraduates at a Chinese university
Abstract
Career planning competence (CPC) is a planning-specific form of adaptive career behaviour through which students translate career intentions into structured goals, action plans, and feedback-based adjustment. This study examined CPC across undergraduate grade levels and programme contexts among 1,009 students at a public university in Chengdu, China, using a cross-sectional cohort-comparison design. The sample included 372 English-major students enrolled in teacher-education programmes and 637 students enrolled in non-education programmes. Two-way analyses of variance showed significant main effects of grade level and programme type on total CPC and all five dimensions, whereas Grade × Programme type interactions were not significant. CPC was similar among freshmen and sophomores, higher among juniors than among students in the first two years, and did not differ significantly between juniors and seniors. English-major teacher-education students reported higher total CPC and higher scores across all five dimensions than non-education students, with small effect sizes. These findings indicate that CPC is associated with undergraduate stage and programme context, but do not establish within-person developmental change or causal effects of programme structure. The study contributes to a context-sensitive understanding of career self-regulation and planning-related adaptive behaviour in higher education.
Related
- Career adaptability and career insecurity in the association between university career support and mental wellbeing among Chinese undergraduates
- Association among first-aid literacy, training and life meaning: a KAP study of first-year undergraduates at a comprehensive university in China
- Building social medicine competence in undergraduates via family follow-up studies in Türkiye
- Problem-solving confidence, approach-avoidance style, and personal control among physical education undergraduates in Rwanda: a correlational study of differences by gender, instructional support, and year of study
- Perceived quality of teaching and course engagement in entrepreneurship education: the moderating role of teacher interpersonal behaviour among first-year undergraduates at a Chinese university
BibTeX
@article{yang2026grade,
title = {{Grade- and programme-related differences in career planning competence among undergraduates at a Chinese university}},
author = {Jianbu Yang and Qianqian Jin and Xingpeng Zheng},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-73006-8},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-73006-8},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Grade- and programme-related differences in career planning competence among undergraduates at a Chinese university
AU - Jianbu Yang
AU - Qianqian Jin
AU - Xingpeng Zheng
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/15
JO - Scientific Reports
DO - 10.1038/s41598-026-73006-8
UR - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-73006-8
AB - Career planning competence (CPC) is a planning-specific form of adaptive career behaviour through which students translate career intentions into structured goals, action plans, and feedback-based adjustment. This study examined CPC across undergraduate grade levels and programme contexts among 1,009 students at a public university in Chengdu, China, using a cross-sectional cohort-comparison design. The sample included 372 English-major students enrolled in teacher-education programmes and 637 students enrolled in non-education programmes. Two-way analyses of variance showed significant main effects of grade level and programme type on total CPC and all five dimensions, whereas Grade × Programme type interactions were not significant. CPC was similar among freshmen and sophomores, higher among juniors than among students in the first two years, and did not differ significantly between juniors and seniors. English-major teacher-education students reported higher total CPC and higher scores across all five dimensions than non-education students, with small effect sizes. These findings indicate that CPC is associated with undergraduate stage and programme context, but do not establish within-person developmental change or causal effects of programme structure. The study contributes to a context-sensitive understanding of career self-regulation and planning-related adaptive behaviour in higher education.
SN - 2045-2322
ER -