Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 51 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Spatial Partner Markets: Effective Competition, Scale, and Opportunity

Abstract

Local partner markets differ not only in population size but in relative partner availability, the scale of opportunity, marriage timing, and population turnover. This paper develops a county-level framework for comparing these conditions across local partner markets. The empirical application focuses on unmarried women ages 25-34 and uses observed partner-age pairings to construct age-specific weights for the relevant unmarried male population. We model absolute opportunity separately, fitting a Michaelis-Menten diminishing-returns transformation to 192 scenarios that vary dating intensity, search horizon, fit, and first-date conversion. The resulting index also incorporates the share of women ages 35-39 who have never married and the inflow rate of adults ages 25-34. Among 320 counties with complete data, the District of Columbia ranks first and New York County second under the baseline specification, and rankings remain highly stable under alternative component weights. An endogenous mobility extension shows that favorable markets attract additional male participants, producing substantial adjustment while leaving the top composite rankings relatively stable over the parameter values considered. The framework is intended as a structural comparison of local partner-market conditions rather than a predictor of individual relationship outcomes.

Related

  1. Dynamic mean-variance portfolio selection with no-shorting constraints and unknown investment opportunity sets
    Xun Li, Yutian Wang, Xun Yu Zhou
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Adaptive Bandit Algorithms for Contextual Matching Markets
    Shiyun Lin, Simon Mauras, Vianney Perchet +1
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral mathematicsHAL
  3. Beyond GNSS: Leveraging LEO Satellite Signals of Opportunity for Doppler Positioning
    Md. Ali Hasan, M. Humayun Kabir, Sangmin Han +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  4. A nested factor model for equity markets: reconciling multifractal stock returns and rough index volatilities
    Othmane Zarhali, Cecilia Aubrun, Emmanuel Bacry +2
    Quantitative FinancePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral mathematicsHAL
  5. LEO Signals-of-Opportunity for Navigation in Urban Environments: A GLRT-Assisted Off-Grid SBL Approach
    Maedeh Sotoodenia, Mohammad Hossein Kahaei, Alireza Nezamalhosseini
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{mehta2026spatial,
  title = {{Spatial Partner Markets: Effective Competition, Scale, and Opportunity}},
  author = {Curren K. Mehta},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.17119},
  eprint = {2610.17119},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17119},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Spatial Partner Markets: Effective Competition, Scale, and Opportunity
AU  - Curren K. Mehta
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.17119
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17119
AB  - Local partner markets differ not only in population size but in relative partner availability, the scale of opportunity, marriage timing, and population turnover. This paper develops a county-level framework for comparing these conditions across local partner markets. The empirical application focuses on unmarried women ages 25-34 and uses observed partner-age pairings to construct age-specific weights for the relevant unmarried male population. We model absolute opportunity separately, fitting a Michaelis-Menten diminishing-returns transformation to 192 scenarios that vary dating intensity, search horizon, fit, and first-date conversion. The resulting index also incorporates the share of women ages 35-39 who have never married and the inflow rate of adults ages 25-34. Among 320 counties with complete data, the District of Columbia ranks first and New York County second under the baseline specification, and rankings remain highly stable under alternative component weights. An endogenous mobility extension shows that favorable markets attract additional male participants, producing substantial adjustment while leaving the top composite rankings relatively stable over the parameter values considered. The framework is intended as a structural comparison of local partner-market conditions rather than a predictor of individual relationship outcomes.
ER  -