Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Associations of pet ownership and pet attachment with a metabolite-based psychosocial distress score and circulating metabolomic profiles

3 more authors
  1. 1Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

IntroductionPet ownership is widespread, with many owners reporting emotional benefits, but evidence on its psychological and biological effects remains mixed. Prior research has linked strong pet attachment, particularly to dogs, to lower psychosocial distress, but underlying biological mechanisms are not well understood. We examined associations of pet ownership and attachment with a metabolite-based psychosocial distress score (MDS) and broader metabolic profiles, distinguishing between dogs and cats.

MethodsWe analyzed data from 213 participants (131 pet owners, 82 non-owners), using the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale and a previously developed MDS reflecting psychosocial distress. Linear regression assessed associations between pet variables and MDS or individual metabolites, adjusting for demographic, lifestyle, and health factors. Metabolite set enrichment analysis identified associated metabolite classes.

ResultsPet ownership and pet attachment were not associated with MDS overall. However, stronger pet attachment was associated with lower MDS ({beta}(95%CI)=-0.58(-1.07,-0.08), p=0.02) among dog owners but not cat owners. Across all measured metabolites, N6,N6-dimethyllysine was significantly associated with pet attachment. Several metabolite classes were associated with pet ownership and attachment, with some in opposite directions. For example, triglycerides with than three double bonds were positively associated with ownership but inversely with attachment, particularly among cat owners.

ConclusionAlthough pet ownership and attachment were not associated with MDS overall, stronger attachment was associated with lower MDS among dog owners but not cat owners. Pet ownership and attachment showed distinct metabolomic patterns, with differences between dog and cat owners. Further studies are needed to replicate and expand on these findings.

Related

  1. Very low-calorie diet reduces hepatic steatosis and remodels circulating metabolite-microRNAs networks in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: A pilot study
    P. Deb, D. Bagar, P. Kumar +10
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEndocrinology & metabolismmedRxiv
  2. Prospective associations between psychosocial work exposures and general practitioner consultations in France
    Isabelle Niedhammer, Maël Quatrevaux
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. Latent Profiles of Primary Emotional Systems and Their Associations with PTSD, CPTSD, Attachment, and Childhood Adversity.
    Paulo Ferrajão, Rebeca Fernandes Rocha, Amadeu Quelhas Martins
    European journal of investigation in health, psychology and educationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  4. Proteomic and metabolomic correlates of sociodemographic factors and their associations with kidney and cardiovascular outcomes: findings from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort
    Insa M. Schmidt, Aditya Surapaneni, Ashish Verma +10
    American journal of preventive cardiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Gender differences in problematic pornography use: associations with personality traits and attachment styles.
    Aleksandra Cupta, Piotr Luszuk, Stanisław K Czerwiński +3
    Current issues in personality psychologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@misc{zeleznik2026associations,
  title = {{Associations of pet ownership and pet attachment with a metabolite-based psychosocial distress score and circulating metabolomic profiles}},
  author = {O. A. Zeleznik and S. Strohmaier and P. A. Le and A. H. Eliassen and C. Huttenhower and C. Westgarth and M. Zebrowska and T. Huang and F. Laden and J. Hart and B. Rosner and I. Kawachi and J. Chavarro and O. I. Okereke and E. S. Schernhammer},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.03.26361932},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.03.26361932v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Associations of pet ownership and pet attachment with a metabolite-based psychosocial distress score and circulating metabolomic profiles
AU  - O. A. Zeleznik
AU  - S. Strohmaier
AU  - P. A. Le
AU  - A. H. Eliassen
AU  - C. Huttenhower
AU  - C. Westgarth
AU  - M. Zebrowska
AU  - T. Huang
AU  - F. Laden
AU  - J. Hart
AU  - B. Rosner
AU  - I. Kawachi
AU  - J. Chavarro
AU  - O. I. Okereke
AU  - E. S. Schernhammer
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/03
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.03.26361932
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.03.26361932v1
AB  - IntroductionPet ownership is widespread, with many owners reporting emotional benefits, but evidence on its psychological and biological effects remains mixed. Prior research has linked strong pet attachment, particularly to dogs, to lower psychosocial distress, but underlying biological mechanisms are not well understood. We examined associations of pet ownership and attachment with a metabolite-based psychosocial distress score (MDS) and broader metabolic profiles, distinguishing between dogs and cats.  MethodsWe analyzed data from 213 participants (131 pet owners, 82 non-owners), using the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale and a previously developed MDS reflecting psychosocial distress. Linear regression assessed associations between pet variables and MDS or individual metabolites, adjusting for demographic, lifestyle, and health factors. Metabolite set enrichment analysis identified associated metabolite classes.  ResultsPet ownership and pet attachment were not associated with MDS overall. However, stronger pet attachment was associated with lower MDS ({beta}(95%CI)=-0.58(-1.07,-0.08), p=0.02) among dog owners but not cat owners. Across all measured metabolites, N6,N6-dimethyllysine was significantly associated with pet attachment. Several metabolite classes were associated with pet ownership and attachment, with some in opposite directions. For example, triglycerides with than three double bonds were positively associated with ownership but inversely with attachment, particularly among cat owners.  ConclusionAlthough pet ownership and attachment were not associated with MDS overall, stronger attachment was associated with lower MDS among dog owners but not cat owners. Pet ownership and attachment showed distinct metabolomic patterns, with differences between dog and cat owners. Further studies are needed to replicate and expand on these findings.
ER  -