Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC public health

Associations between individual-level factors and adherence to social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: a global meta-analysis.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Agent-Based Modelling Laboratory, Centre of Excellence in AI for Public Health Advancement, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.
  2. 2Laboratory for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Centre of Excellence in AI for Public Health Advancement, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.
  3. 3National Laboratory for Health Security, University of Szeged, Szeged, 6720, Hungary.
  4. 4Agent-Based Modelling Laboratory, Centre of Excellence in AI for Public Health Advancement, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada. [email protected].

Abstract

Background

Social distancing was a cornerstone of the COVID-19 pandemic response, yet evidence on factors associated with adherence remains fragmented and context-specific. We conducted a global meta-analysis to quantify the associations between key individual-level determinants and adherence to social distancing measures.Methods

We systematically searched six electronic databases from inception to August 20, 2025 to identify studies reporting associations between individual-level determinants and adherence to social distancing measures. Effect estimates were transformed into Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to examine regional and temporal variation.Results

Of 10,804 records identified, 58 cross‑sectional studies comprising 545,640 participants were included, and fourteen determinants of adherence to social distancing were assessed. Higher educational attainment (r = 0.09), female sex (r = 0.08), being married (r = 0.08), older age (r = 0.06), higher income (r = 0.07), and greater perceived risk and severity of COVID-19 (r = 0.10) were positively associated with adherence, whereas more conservative political ideology was negatively associated (r = -0.12). No significant associations were observed for perceived government response, comorbidity, place of residence, knowledge and awareness, smoking, employment status, or essential worker status. The magnitude and statistical significance of several associations varied across World Health Organization regions, with the European region showing the highest number of determinants significantly associated with adherence, whereas the African and Eastern Mediterranean regions exhibited the fewest.Conclusion

Adherence to social distancing during COVID-19 was associated with a set of demographic, socioeconomic, psychological, and political factors, with substantial regional heterogeneity. These findings underscore the importance of accounting for contextual and structural differences when interpreting behavioural evidence and designing public health responses to future disease outbreaks.

Related

  1. Mediterranean Diet Adherence and Sleep Quality in Spanish Adults: Divergent Associations Between Subjective and Objective Measures
    Rosario Alonso-Domínguez, Jesús González-Sánchez, César Jiménez-Vaquero +4
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. Emergency presentations following youth suicide attempts during the COVID-19 pandemic: temporal trends and associations with containment measures
    Johannes Schmier, Paul L. Plener, Diana Klinger
    European Child & Adolescent PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  3. Combining natural language processing with patient-reported outcome measures scores to investigate the association of pandemic regulations with anxiety in children
    Michiel A. J. Luijten, Chris Gibbons, Conrad J. Harrison +8
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  4. Societal values versus individual rights with respect to public health related practices during the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S.
    Courtney Bir, Nicole Olynk Widmar, Christopher A. Wolf +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthInfectious diseasePLOS
  5. Human dignity and its associations with self efficacy and treatment adherence in adults with type 2 diabetes in Iran
    Yasaman Fallah, Narges Hashemi, Mahrokh Keshvari +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismCrossref
BibTeX
@article{sumsuzzman2026associations,
  title = {{Associations between individual-level factors and adherence to social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: a global meta-analysis.}},
  author = {Dewan Md Sumsuzzman and Congjie Shi and Gergely Röst and Jianhong Wu and Seyed M Moghadas},
  journal = {BMC public health},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-28873-1},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42972331},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Associations between individual-level factors and adherence to social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: a global meta-analysis.
AU  - Dewan Md Sumsuzzman
AU  - Congjie Shi
AU  - Gergely Röst
AU  - Jianhong Wu
AU  - Seyed M Moghadas
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/05
JO  - BMC public health
DO  - 10.1186/s12889-026-28873-1
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42972331
AB  - Background  Social distancing was a cornerstone of the COVID-19 pandemic response, yet evidence on factors associated with adherence remains fragmented and context-specific. We conducted a global meta-analysis to quantify the associations between key individual-level determinants and adherence to social distancing measures.Methods  We systematically searched six electronic databases from inception to August 20, 2025 to identify studies reporting associations between individual-level determinants and adherence to social distancing measures. Effect estimates were transformed into Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to examine regional and temporal variation.Results  Of 10,804 records identified, 58 cross‑sectional studies comprising 545,640 participants were included, and fourteen determinants of adherence to social distancing were assessed. Higher educational attainment (r = 0.09), female sex (r = 0.08), being married (r = 0.08), older age (r = 0.06), higher income (r = 0.07), and greater perceived risk and severity of COVID-19 (r = 0.10) were positively associated with adherence, whereas more conservative political ideology was negatively associated (r = -0.12). No significant associations were observed for perceived government response, comorbidity, place of residence, knowledge and awareness, smoking, employment status, or essential worker status. The magnitude and statistical significance of several associations varied across World Health Organization regions, with the European region showing the highest number of determinants significantly associated with adherence, whereas the African and Eastern Mediterranean regions exhibited the fewest.Conclusion  Adherence to social distancing during COVID-19 was associated with a set of demographic, socioeconomic, psychological, and political factors, with substantial regional heterogeneity. These findings underscore the importance of accounting for contextual and structural differences when interpreting behavioural evidence and designing public health responses to future disease outbreaks.
SN  - 1471-2458
ER  -