Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

The building blocks of social structure: simulating constraints of social network analysis for inference about group-level properties

  1. 1Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology

Abstract

The interdisciplinary usage of Social Network Analysis (SNA) means that, when researchers calculate global network metrics, the research interest can range from the ultimate ecological and evolutionary pressures that select for specific group-level structures or the proximate mechanisms by which those structures emerge. Despite major methodological advances, social structures measured via SNA metrics are rarely connected to the underlying forces shaped by latent individual dispositions, ecological constraints, and their interplay with group-level affordances. We build a model to simulate fission-fusion spatial association data from a specified set of parameters in order to address the "black box" of animal SNA. We broke down animal social systems into three building blocks: individual dispositions, external factors, and the social structure that emerges. Each of these building blocks was represented by one or more model parameters, which together describe a set of underlying processes that lead to different measurable features of animal social structure, which we quantified with commonly used global network metrics within an SNA framework (e.g., clustering coefficient, density, modularity). In doing so, our model directly links global network metrics to the underlying behavioural processes that generate them and demonstrates how global network metrics can be influenced by changes to their underlying behavioural processes. Holding all other parameters constant, we find that subtle changes to 1) demography (i.e., group size) and ecology (i.e., size and variability of foraging parties), 2) variation of individual behaviour and related observation bias, 3) imposed group sub-structures, and 4) observation effort, affect all network metrics calculated non-linearly and in some cases non-monotonically. Our findings indicate that failure to account for the underlying behavioural processes can bias inference drawn from SNA. This model and conceptual framework provide a novel tool with which to begin opening the black box of SNA and to systematically address the evolution of diverse group-level social structures.

Related

  1. Correcting for ascertainment bias in the inference of population structure
    Gilles Guillot, Matthieu Foll
    BioinformaticsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text34 citedGenetics & genomicsHAL
  2. Functional properties of the handwriting brain network: Effects of motor sequence and spatial adaptation constraints
    Lauriane Véron-Delor, Marieke Longcamp, Jean-Luc Anton +6
    CortexPeer-reviewedCC BY1 citedNeuroscienceHAL
  3. Data-driven inference of local behavioural rules predicts emergent properties of Phytophthora zoospore dispersal
    Joelle Le Berre, Agnès Attard, Edouard Evangelisti
    HALPreprintCC BYFull textMicrobiologyGeneral mathematicsHALbioRxiv
  4. Distance-AF Multimer: A Multi-Step Approach for Protein Complex Structure Modeling with User-Defined Distance Constraints
    K. Ling, Y. Zhang, Z. Zhang +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  5. Reciprocal effective conductance-based inference of protein-protein relationships delineates protein network hubs and macromolecular properties
    R. K C, S. Zhou, R. Cheng +3
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{brooks2026building,
  title = {{The building blocks of social structure: simulating constraints of social network analysis for inference about group-level properties}},
  author = {J. Brooks and G. Badihi and L. Samuni},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.17.752303},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.17.752303v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The building blocks of social structure: simulating constraints of social network analysis for inference about group-level properties
AU  - J. Brooks
AU  - G. Badihi
AU  - L. Samuni
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/17
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.17.752303
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.17.752303v1
AB  - The interdisciplinary usage of Social Network Analysis (SNA) means that, when researchers calculate global network metrics, the research interest can range from the ultimate ecological and evolutionary pressures that select for specific group-level structures or the proximate mechanisms by which those structures emerge. Despite major methodological advances, social structures measured via SNA metrics are rarely connected to the underlying forces shaped by latent individual dispositions, ecological constraints, and their interplay with group-level affordances. We build a model to simulate fission-fusion spatial association data from a specified set of parameters in order to address the "black box" of animal SNA. We broke down animal social systems into three building blocks: individual dispositions, external factors, and the social structure that emerges. Each of these building blocks was represented by one or more model parameters, which together describe a set of underlying processes that lead to different measurable features of animal social structure, which we quantified with commonly used global network metrics within an SNA framework (e.g., clustering coefficient, density, modularity). In doing so, our model directly links global network metrics to the underlying behavioural processes that generate them and demonstrates how global network metrics can be influenced by changes to their underlying behavioural processes. Holding all other parameters constant, we find that subtle changes to 1) demography (i.e., group size) and ecology (i.e., size and variability of foraging parties), 2) variation of individual behaviour and related observation bias, 3) imposed group sub-structures, and 4) observation effort, affect all network metrics calculated non-linearly and in some cases non-monotonically. Our findings indicate that failure to account for the underlying behavioural processes can bias inference drawn from SNA. This model and conceptual framework provide a novel tool with which to begin opening the black box of SNA and to systematically address the evolution of diverse group-level social structures.
ER  -