Is Aging a Failure to Resolve? Integrating Damage Responses, Regenerative Decline, and Geroscience Interventions
- 1Division of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 6a Chalubinskiego Street, 50-368 Wrocław, Poland
- 2University Center of General and Oncological Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
Abstract
Biological aging is accompanied by persistent tissue-damage signaling, chronic inflammation, extracellular matrix remodeling, cellular senescence, and declining regenerative capacity. Taken together, these features resemble an injury response that is repeatedly initiated but fails to progress reliably through clearance, reconstruction, and functional recovery. This resemblance motivated the proposal that aging is a wound that never starts healing. Here, we develop that proposal into a testable failed-resolution framework in which some age-related dysfunction reflects damage responses that exceed organ-specific capacities for intracellular quality control, efferocytosis, immune termination, matrix normalization, and cell replacement. Its central predictions are that (i) impaired recovery kinetics will forecast functional decline beyond established measures of biological age, (ii) restoring resolution will improve tissue function beyond suppressing inflammatory markers, and (iii) efficacy will depend on treatment phase and tissue-specific failure mode. We specify which age-related processes lie outside the framework and propose measurements spanning damage burden, danger sensing, resolution competence, regenerative reserve, organ function, and recovery after standardized challenge. Supporting evidence is predominantly preclinical, whereas human studies provide mechanistic findings, target engagement, or domain-specific effects. Failed resolution thus offers a falsifiable research program for testing tissue recovery as a therapeutic target in aging.
Related
- Medicament identity rather than total loading governs the morphology of electrospun poly(vinylpyrrolidone) nanofibers for regenerative endodontics: a machine learning analysis of a failure-inclusive dataset
- Comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals conserved injury responses and divergent molecular responses underlying early regenerative competence following traumatic brain injury
- Integrating multi-omics analysis reveals shared genetic architecture and spatial correlations between heart failure and osteoporosis
- From wellness to medicine: Geroscience, biomarkers and the translational emergence of longevity medicine
- Lifestyle-Associated Biomarkers of Cellular and Whole-Organism Aging: A Practical Roadmap for Human Geroscience Trials
BibTeX
@article{chmielewski2026aging,
title = {{Is Aging a Failure to Resolve? Integrating Damage Responses, Regenerative Decline, and Geroscience Interventions}},
author = {Piotr Paweł Chmielewski and Bartłomiej Strzelec},
journal = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/ijms27208987},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/27/20/8987},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Is Aging a Failure to Resolve? Integrating Damage Responses, Regenerative Decline, and Geroscience Interventions
AU - Piotr Paweł Chmielewski
AU - Bartłomiej Strzelec
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - International Journal of Molecular Sciences
DO - 10.3390/ijms27208987
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/27/20/8987
AB - Biological aging is accompanied by persistent tissue-damage signaling, chronic inflammation, extracellular matrix remodeling, cellular senescence, and declining regenerative capacity. Taken together, these features resemble an injury response that is repeatedly initiated but fails to progress reliably through clearance, reconstruction, and functional recovery. This resemblance motivated the proposal that aging is a wound that never starts healing. Here, we develop that proposal into a testable failed-resolution framework in which some age-related dysfunction reflects damage responses that exceed organ-specific capacities for intracellular quality control, efferocytosis, immune termination, matrix normalization, and cell replacement. Its central predictions are that (i) impaired recovery kinetics will forecast functional decline beyond established measures of biological age, (ii) restoring resolution will improve tissue function beyond suppressing inflammatory markers, and (iii) efficacy will depend on treatment phase and tissue-specific failure mode. We specify which age-related processes lie outside the framework and propose measurements spanning damage burden, danger sensing, resolution competence, regenerative reserve, organ function, and recovery after standardized challenge. Supporting evidence is predominantly preclinical, whereas human studies provide mechanistic findings, target engagement, or domain-specific effects. Failed resolution thus offers a falsifiable research program for testing tissue recovery as a therapeutic target in aging.
SN - 1422-0067
ER -