Phasic pupil responses to melanopsin- and cone-directed stimulation remain stable across circadian time
- 1Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Abstract
Human pupil responses vary with time of day, but whether this reflects circadian modulation of specific photoreceptor pathways is unclear. Twelve healthy adults completed repeated pupillometry during a 40-hour ultra-short sleep-wake protocol that limited sustained wakefulness; data from eight met the quality-control criteria and were analysed. This design was intended to limit progressive accumulation of homeostatic sleep pressure across sampled circadian phase. During wake episodes, 0.4-Hz silent-substitution stimuli targeted broadband flux, melanopsin, luminance, L-M cone-opponent, or S-cone pathways. Salivary melatonin provided participant-specific period estimates. We separated slow tonic constriction from phasic pupil tracking and compared hierarchical circadian cosinor models with constant-level models. Constant-level models were favoured for phasic amplitude in all five conditions (log10 BF10 = -3.36 to -1.10). They were also favoured for tonic minimum in four conditions; L-M favoured the circadian model (log10 BF10 = 0.67), but the evidence was imprecise. Under the tested contrast, adaptation, and frequency, these data do not support circadian modulation of phasic photoreceptor-directed pupil tracking. Other metrics and smaller or non-sinusoidal effects remain possible.
Related
- Temporal patterns of melanopsin-evoked calcium signaling engage NF-κB-associated transcriptional and phosphoproteomic responses
- Vibrotactile stimulation on the upper back requires stronger vibration during goal-directed reaching but does not impede reaching performance
- Circadian and Sex-Specific Responses to Alternaria alternata in Allergic Airway Inflammation
- Dynamic EEG network responses to acupuncture stimulation in patients with stroke: a neurophysiological study
- B cell responses to CD40 stimulation ignite anti-tumor immunity by activating CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity
BibTeX
@misc{heinrichs2026phasic,
title = {{Phasic pupil responses to melanopsin- and cone-directed stimulation remain stable across circadian time}},
author = {H. Heinrichs and D. Glebowicz and M. Spitschan},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.13.758787},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.13.758787v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Phasic pupil responses to melanopsin- and cone-directed stimulation remain stable across circadian time
AU - H. Heinrichs
AU - D. Glebowicz
AU - M. Spitschan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/13
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.13.758787
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.13.758787v1
AB - Human pupil responses vary with time of day, but whether this reflects circadian modulation of specific photoreceptor pathways is unclear. Twelve healthy adults completed repeated pupillometry during a 40-hour ultra-short sleep-wake protocol that limited sustained wakefulness; data from eight met the quality-control criteria and were analysed. This design was intended to limit progressive accumulation of homeostatic sleep pressure across sampled circadian phase. During wake episodes, 0.4-Hz silent-substitution stimuli targeted broadband flux, melanopsin, luminance, L-M cone-opponent, or S-cone pathways. Salivary melatonin provided participant-specific period estimates. We separated slow tonic constriction from phasic pupil tracking and compared hierarchical circadian cosinor models with constant-level models. Constant-level models were favoured for phasic amplitude in all five conditions (log10 BF10 = -3.36 to -1.10). They were also favoured for tonic minimum in four conditions; L-M favoured the circadian model (log10 BF10 = 0.67), but the evidence was imprecise. Under the tested contrast, adaptation, and frequency, these data do not support circadian modulation of phasic photoreceptor-directed pupil tracking. Other metrics and smaller or non-sinusoidal effects remain possible.
ER -