Political Persuasion and Endorsement in Large Language Models
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly employed as proxies for human behavior in computational social science. However, their tendency to internalize biases from training data raises concerns about their reliability in politically sensitive domains, specifically regarding their endorsement of persuasive language. In this work, we examine whether LLMs endorse persuasion-infused messages and whether partisan persona prompting modulates such endorsement. We evaluate six LLMs from different geographic regions on content annotated with persuasion techniques drawn from real-world media sources, measuring the likelihood of endorsement using a five-point Likert scale. The models are prompted as either a neutral social media user or as a user with left- or right-leaning political views. Results show that, without political conditioning, LLMs generally do not endorse messages containing persuasion techniques, although model-level differences emerge, and that partisan persona prompting increases polarization of endorsement, particularly for persuasion-infused content. Endorsement further varies across persuasion techniques and topics. These findings reveal how political conditioning influences LLMs' endorsement behavior toward persuasion-infused content, raising concerns about their deployment as agents in politically sensitive environments and complicating their use as reliable simulators of human political cognition.
Related
- Large Language Models for Quantum Code Translation: An Exploratory Study
- Self-Reference in Large Language Models: The Introspection Threshold for Recursive Self-Improvement
- Large-Language Models as a Cognitive Virus
- Large-Language-Model Discovery of Quantum LDPC Codes through Structured Concept Evolution
- Towards a universal meta-optics solver via large language models
BibTeX
@misc{antelmi2026political,
title = {{Political Persuasion and Endorsement in Large Language Models}},
author = {Alessia Antelmi and Alessia Galdeman and Lucio La Cava and Arianna Pera and Giovanni Da San Martino},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2606.05961},
eprint = {2606.05961},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05961},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Political Persuasion and Endorsement in Large Language Models
AU - Alessia Antelmi
AU - Alessia Galdeman
AU - Lucio La Cava
AU - Arianna Pera
AU - Giovanni Da San Martino
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/23
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2606.05961
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05961
AB - Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly employed as proxies for human behavior in computational social science. However, their tendency to internalize biases from training data raises concerns about their reliability in politically sensitive domains, specifically regarding their endorsement of persuasive language. In this work, we examine whether LLMs endorse persuasion-infused messages and whether partisan persona prompting modulates such endorsement. We evaluate six LLMs from different geographic regions on content annotated with persuasion techniques drawn from real-world media sources, measuring the likelihood of endorsement using a five-point Likert scale. The models are prompted as either a neutral social media user or as a user with left- or right-leaning political views. Results show that, without political conditioning, LLMs generally do not endorse messages containing persuasion techniques, although model-level differences emerge, and that partisan persona prompting increases polarization of endorsement, particularly for persuasion-infused content. Endorsement further varies across persuasion techniques and topics. These findings reveal how political conditioning influences LLMs' endorsement behavior toward persuasion-infused content, raising concerns about their deployment as agents in politically sensitive environments and complicating their use as reliable simulators of human political cognition.
ER -