Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Taylor Diagram and Wasserstein Distance for Model Evaluation

Abstract

The Taylor diagram is used to evaluate and compare predictive models with observed data and has many applications in climate and environmental sciences. Three statistics of interest--the centered root-mean-squared error, standard deviation, and the product-moment correlation coefficient--are related by the law of cosines; Taylor diagrams leverage this fact to allow visualization of all three statistics in a two-dimensional plot without any loss of information. In this work, we present a novel model evaluation tool--the Wasserstein-Taylor diagram--formed from integrating the Wasserstein distance from optimal transport into a Taylor diagram framework. This tool is built upon the fact that the law of cosines still holds in the Taylor diagram if the centered root-mean-squared error and product-moment correlation coefficient are replaced by the centered 2-Wasserstein distance and quantile correlation coefficient, respectively. The advantage of this Wasserstein-Taylor diagram is that one can use the distribution perspective afforded by the Wasserstein distance to compare observed and predicted data sets of different sizes and even to compare statistical models with only observed data. We further show that the quantile correlation coefficient on empirical measures converges to the quantile correlation coefficient on the sampled measures.

Related

  1. The p-Bures-Wasserstein distance via 3×3 block matrices (with application to p-Bures-Wasserstein barycenters)
    Suvrit Sra
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsGeometry & topologyarXiv
  2. Relations between different definitions of the quantum Wasserstein distance
    Géza Tóth, József Pitrik
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. λ-geodesic convexity of the squared sliced-Wasserstein distance
    Giacomo Cozzi, Filippo Santambrogio
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Fast rigid rotational alignment of voxelized 3-D density maps in sliced Wasserstein distance
    Oscar Mickelin, Yunpeng Shi, Amit Singer +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  5. Martingale central limit theorems in p-Wasserstein distance
    Xiao Fang, Yuta Koike, Zi-Yao Su
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chen2026taylor,
  title = {{Taylor Diagram and Wasserstein Distance for Model Evaluation}},
  author = {Dongwei Chen and Emily J. King and Hungjui Yu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.17950},
  eprint = {2609.17950},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17950},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Taylor Diagram and Wasserstein Distance for Model Evaluation
AU  - Dongwei Chen
AU  - Emily J. King
AU  - Hungjui Yu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.17950
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17950
AB  - The Taylor diagram is used to evaluate and compare predictive models with observed data and has many applications in climate and environmental sciences. Three statistics of interest--the centered root-mean-squared error, standard deviation, and the product-moment correlation coefficient--are related by the law of cosines; Taylor diagrams leverage this fact to allow visualization of all three statistics in a two-dimensional plot without any loss of information. In this work, we present a novel model evaluation tool--the Wasserstein-Taylor diagram--formed from integrating the Wasserstein distance from optimal transport into a Taylor diagram framework. This tool is built upon the fact that the law of cosines still holds in the Taylor diagram if the centered root-mean-squared error and product-moment correlation coefficient are replaced by the centered 2-Wasserstein distance and quantile correlation coefficient, respectively. The advantage of this Wasserstein-Taylor diagram is that one can use the distribution perspective afforded by the Wasserstein distance to compare observed and predicted data sets of different sizes and even to compare statistical models with only observed data. We further show that the quantile correlation coefficient on empirical measures converges to the quantile correlation coefficient on the sampled measures.
ER  -