Power quasinormal operators and the root problem
Abstract
In this paper, we construct an n-power quasinormal operator T such that Tn is not quasinormal for some positive integer n, thereby providing a counterexample to \cite[Lemma 3.1]{ko-filomat-2023}. We then investigate the relationships among the n-power quasinormality of T, the normality of Tn, and the quasinormality of Tn, and show that these three conditions are equivalent in finite-dimensional spaces. We also provide a new proof that n-power quasinormal operators have the single-valued extension property \cite[Theorem 3.2]{ko-filomat-2023}; unlike the original proof, our argument does not rely on \cite[Lemma 3.1]{ko-filomat-2023} and thus closes the gap in the original argument. In addition, for a fixed operator T, we characterize all positive integers n for which T is n-power quasinormal. As consequences, several results of Sid Ahmed \cite{ahmed-bmaa-2011} are extended. Finally, we prove that every paranormal n-power quasinormal operator is quasinormal. Closely related to this, we also give an affirmative answer to the root problem of Stanković and Kubrusly \cite[Question 2.11]{stankovic-afa-2025}.
Related
- Reduced Embry characterizations of quasinormal operators
- Quasinormal and hyponormal operators in the β(H)-class
- Symplectic-inspired neural operators for discretization-invariant light propagation with exact power conservation
- Calderón problem for fractional Schrödinger operators on closed Riemannian manifolds
- Boundary and Interior of Root Sets of Power Series
BibTeX
@misc{zhou2026power,
title = {{Power quasinormal operators and the root problem}},
author = {Jing-Bin Zhou and Shihai Yang},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.09775},
eprint = {2609.09775},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09775},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Power quasinormal operators and the root problem
AU - Jing-Bin Zhou
AU - Shihai Yang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/09
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.09775
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09775
AB - In this paper, we construct an n-power quasinormal operator T such that T^n is not quasinormal for some positive integer n, thereby providing a counterexample to \cite[Lemma 3.1]{ko-filomat-2023}. We then investigate the relationships among the n-power quasinormality of T, the normality of T^n, and the quasinormality of T^n, and show that these three conditions are equivalent in finite-dimensional spaces. We also provide a new proof that n-power quasinormal operators have the single-valued extension property \cite[Theorem 3.2]{ko-filomat-2023}; unlike the original proof, our argument does not rely on \cite[Lemma 3.1]{ko-filomat-2023} and thus closes the gap in the original argument. In addition, for a fixed operator T, we characterize all positive integers n for which T is n-power quasinormal. As consequences, several results of Sid Ahmed \cite{ahmed-bmaa-2011} are extended. Finally, we prove that every paranormal n-power quasinormal operator is quasinormal. Closely related to this, we also give an affirmative answer to the root problem of Stanković and Kubrusly \cite[Question 2.11]{stankovic-afa-2025}.
ER -