PreprintarXiv licencearXiv
Cone Avoidance and the No-Least-Join Theorem
Abstract
We give a column-avoidance modification of the no-least-join construction of Downey, Greenberg, Lewis, and Montalbán. We show that if C is computably enumerable, A,B<T C, and Anot≤T B, then for every noncomputable set E there is a set X≤T C such that B≤T A⊕ X and Enot≤T X. Consequently, for the corresponding Turing degrees a,b,c, the degrees x≤ c satisfying b≤ a∨ x have no nonzero common lower bound; equivalently, no nonzero Turing cone contains all of them. This gives a negative answer to their Question 1.19.
Related
- THE OPTIMAL EIGENVALUE COUNT IN AUBRY'S SPECTRAL SPHERE THEOREM FOR DIMENSIONS AT LEAST FOUR
- A Formal Proof of Riemann Hypothesis from Existence Alone, the Sign Excepted by Theorem: The Constructed Witness, the Identity Cone over the Fixed Locus, the Grounded Counter-Model, and the Cure Theorem Proved in Lean 4 and Re-executed in Fortran
- Cone upgrade for effective equidistribution and weighted Khintchine--Schmidt theorem on fractals
- A proof of the Grothendieck join-meet positivity
- Antimagicness of join graphs
BibTeX
@misc{cintioli2026cone,
title = {{Cone Avoidance and the No-Least-Join Theorem}},
author = {Patrizio Cintioli},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.02027},
eprint = {2610.02027},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02027},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Cone Avoidance and the No-Least-Join Theorem
AU - Patrizio Cintioli
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.02027
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02027
AB - We give a column-avoidance modification of the no-least-join construction of Downey, Greenberg, Lewis, and Montalbán. We show that if C is computably enumerable, A,B<_T C, and Anot≤_T B, then for every noncomputable set E there is a set X≤_T C such that B≤_T A⊕ X and Enot≤_T X. Consequently, for the corresponding Turing degrees a,b,c, the degrees x≤ c satisfying b≤ a∨ x have no nonzero common lower bound; equivalently, no nonzero Turing cone contains all of them. This gives a negative answer to their Question 1.19.
ER -