Environmental enrichment affects growth and behaviour differently in head-started critically endangered freshwater turtles
Abstract
Freshwater chelonians face severe extinction risk, and head-starting programs increasingly rely on captive rearing to offset poor recruitment. However, evaluating success by growth and release numbers overlooks welfare and post-release competence. We assessed head-started Critically Endangered Batagur dhongoka and Batagur kachuga under five enrichment treatments, combining growth data with individual-level behavioural scans and 24-hour group activity budgets over 367 days. Final body mass was highest under mixed enrichment (141.1 g) and lowest under no-enrichment (108.1 g). B. kachuga were heavier than B. dhongoka under all treatments. Enrichment-related behaviour was highest under natural enrichment (52.5%) and lowest under no-enrichment (11.9%), while stress-related behaviour was lowest under seminatural enrichment (1.6%) and highest under no-enrichment (10.7%). Mixed enrichment produced the highest basking response and most balanced group activity budget; natural enrichment the highest shelter-use response. Integrating growth and behaviour at the same month × species × treatment scale, natural enrichment ranked first, mixed second, and no-enrichment last. Environmental enrichment shapes growth and behaviour differently; growth and behavioural metrics should therefore be treated as complementary rather than interchangeable indicators of captive-rearing success. Each species-treatment combination comprised a single chamber, with individual-level behaviour from one marked animal; results are therefore descriptive rather than independently replicated.
Related
- Pumping stations negatively affect the distribution of critically endangered European eel (Anguilla anguilla); a landscape-scale study using environmental DNA metabarcoding
- Unmasking genetic load: Genomic inbreeding drives growth depression in captive critically endangered Chinese Bahaba (Bahaba taipingensis)
- Patterns of Functional Redundancy and Anaerobic Metabolic Potential Characterise the Skin Microbiome of a Critically Endangered Sawfish
- Searching for a Vanishing Fish: Development of an eDNA-Based Digital PCR Assay and Field Surveys for the Critically Endangered Chinese Bahaba
- Habitat use by critically endangered North Pacific right whales linked to sea ice dynamics at varying spatial scales
BibTeX
@article{panda2026environmental,
title = {{Environmental enrichment affects growth and behaviour differently in head-started critically endangered freshwater turtles}},
author = {Ashish Kumar Panda and Debdulal Jana and Anupam Srivastav and Syed Ainul Hussain and Ruchi Badola},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-74436-0},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-74436-0},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Environmental enrichment affects growth and behaviour differently in head-started critically endangered freshwater turtles
AU - Ashish Kumar Panda
AU - Debdulal Jana
AU - Anupam Srivastav
AU - Syed Ainul Hussain
AU - Ruchi Badola
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/11
JO - Scientific Reports
DO - 10.1038/s41598-026-74436-0
UR - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-74436-0
AB - Freshwater chelonians face severe extinction risk, and head-starting programs increasingly rely on captive rearing to offset poor recruitment. However, evaluating success by growth and release numbers overlooks welfare and post-release competence. We assessed head-started Critically Endangered Batagur dhongoka and Batagur kachuga under five enrichment treatments, combining growth data with individual-level behavioural scans and 24-hour group activity budgets over 367 days. Final body mass was highest under mixed enrichment (141.1 g) and lowest under no-enrichment (108.1 g). B. kachuga were heavier than B. dhongoka under all treatments. Enrichment-related behaviour was highest under natural enrichment (52.5%) and lowest under no-enrichment (11.9%), while stress-related behaviour was lowest under seminatural enrichment (1.6%) and highest under no-enrichment (10.7%). Mixed enrichment produced the highest basking response and most balanced group activity budget; natural enrichment the highest shelter-use response. Integrating growth and behaviour at the same month × species × treatment scale, natural enrichment ranked first, mixed second, and no-enrichment last. Environmental enrichment shapes growth and behaviour differently; growth and behavioural metrics should therefore be treated as complementary rather than interchangeable indicators of captive-rearing success. Each species-treatment combination comprised a single chamber, with individual-level behaviour from one marked animal; results are therefore descriptive rather than independently replicated.
SN - 2045-2322
ER -