Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Nutrients

Adaptive Precision Nutrition: Integrating Dynamic Phenotyping, Multi-Omics, Artificial Intelligence, and the Allostatic Viability Principle

  1. 1Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Josef-Holaubek-Platz 2 (UZA II), 1090 Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Precision nutrition increasingly combines functional foods, multi-omics, digital phenotyping, and artificial intelligence, yet the incremental decision value of additional data layers remains uncertain. This critical narrative review and hypothesis-generating conceptual proposal examines evidence on personalized nutrition, dynamic response phenotyping, functional-food heterogeneity, multi-omics integration, and AI-supported decisions. Personalized advice can improve dietary behavior and selected cardiometabolic outcomes, whereas the additional clinical benefit attributable specifically to elaborate molecular profiling has been inconsistent. Dynamic challenge studies suggest that response amplitude, timing, coordination, recovery, and conditional repeatability may provide information beyond static profiles, but reproducibility is required before these features can be treated as person-specific traits. The Allostatic Viability Principle (AVP) is proposed as a conceptual physiological and decision framework rather than a validated predictor or biomarker. Its intended contribution is to organize existing approaches around viable, context-appropriate regulation, proportional use of additional measurements, explicit uncertainty, an outcome hierarchy that does not equate molecular change with health benefit, and a response-and-revision loop. Whether this organization improves decisions or outcomes beyond high-quality conventional or adaptive personalized nutrition remains an empirical question. The framework is therefore presented as a testable structure for determining when additional individual-level information is reproducible, relevant, and sufficiently decision changing to justify use.

Related

  1. Integrating biomarkers and artificial intelligence for precision diagnostics in cattle health and herd management: a review
    Şeyma Aydın, Selçuk Özdemir
    Veterinary Research CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text6 citedZoology & animal behaviourOpenAlex
  2. Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies
    Nikita Aggarwal, Mukesh Rathore, Farkhandah Jan +6
    Theoretical and Applied GeneticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text8 citedPlant biologyOpenAlex
  3. Applying Artificial Intelligence and machine learning in precision nutrition
    Paraskevi Massara, Jonathan Kirkland, Ioanna Pagani +12
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text15 citedGenetics & genomicsOpenAlex
  4. Converging Paths: Artificial Intelligence for Integrating Biological and Digital Biomarkers in Personalized Longevity Medicine
    Timur Saliev, Prim B. Singh
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cell biologyCrossref
  5. Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Microbiome Engineering: Integrating Community Design and Environmental Validation
    Mohammad Nazrul Islam Bhuiyan, Sheikh Julfikar Hossain
    Environmental microbiology reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{haslberger2026adaptive,
  title = {{Adaptive Precision Nutrition: Integrating Dynamic Phenotyping, Multi-Omics, Artificial Intelligence, and the Allostatic Viability Principle}},
  author = {Alexander G. Haslberger},
  journal = {Nutrients},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/nu18203373},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/20/3373},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Adaptive Precision Nutrition: Integrating Dynamic Phenotyping, Multi-Omics, Artificial Intelligence, and the Allostatic Viability Principle
AU  - Alexander G. Haslberger
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
JO  - Nutrients
DO  - 10.3390/nu18203373
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/20/3373
AB  - Precision nutrition increasingly combines functional foods, multi-omics, digital phenotyping, and artificial intelligence, yet the incremental decision value of additional data layers remains uncertain. This critical narrative review and hypothesis-generating conceptual proposal examines evidence on personalized nutrition, dynamic response phenotyping, functional-food heterogeneity, multi-omics integration, and AI-supported decisions. Personalized advice can improve dietary behavior and selected cardiometabolic outcomes, whereas the additional clinical benefit attributable specifically to elaborate molecular profiling has been inconsistent. Dynamic challenge studies suggest that response amplitude, timing, coordination, recovery, and conditional repeatability may provide information beyond static profiles, but reproducibility is required before these features can be treated as person-specific traits. The Allostatic Viability Principle (AVP) is proposed as a conceptual physiological and decision framework rather than a validated predictor or biomarker. Its intended contribution is to organize existing approaches around viable, context-appropriate regulation, proportional use of additional measurements, explicit uncertainty, an outcome hierarchy that does not equate molecular change with health benefit, and a response-and-revision loop. Whether this organization improves decisions or outcomes beyond high-quality conventional or adaptive personalized nutrition remains an empirical question. The framework is therefore presented as a testable structure for determining when additional individual-level information is reproducible, relevant, and sufficiently decision changing to justify use.
SN  - 2072-6643
ER  -