Generating Insights Into (Mis)Information About Measles Vaccination in Amsterdam Through Social Listening, the Netherlands, 2024
- 1GGD Amsterdam
Abstract
Suboptimal vaccination coverage for Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) and increases in measles cases in the Netherlands prompted innovation to support informed vaccine decision-making. Through an iterative approach, this pilot implemented and evaluated social listening in the context of a local public health authority, namely Public Health Service Amsterdam. As a pilot study, we generated insights in measles vaccination. First, potential online and offline social listening data sources were identified. Second, in August-September 2024, data on measles vaccination discourse were gathered. Third, quantitative and qualitative (thematic) analyses were applied to generate insights, and risk assessment was conducted to determine their potential impact on health attitudes. We identified twenty sources for social listening. Six were selected for monitored based on feasibility and relevance. These sources were Public Health Service Amsterdam internal observations (public health professionals observations, source and contact tracers calls, and press inquiries) and three social and news media sources: Coosto, LexisNexis, and Google Trends. Results revealed diverse health beliefs, risk perceptions, concerns, and misinformation shaping vaccination attitudes. Prevalent themes included false claims on effectiveness, causes and effects of measles (vaccination), practical concerns and questions, and positive sentiments. Online and offline social listening enabled insight generation into public health perceptions during an anticipated measles outbreak. This approach is essential for understanding public needs, addressing misinformation, and informing targeted communication during public health challenges.
Author SummaryDeclining vaccination coverage for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) in the Netherlands and concerns about a potential rise in measles cases prompted efforts to better understand public attitudes toward vaccination. To support informed decision-making, we tested a new approach called social listening within the Public Health Service Amsterdam. Social listening combines information from multiple, different sources, both online (e.g. social media, news, and search trends) and offline sources (such as source and contact tracers and reports from public health professionals) to understand what people are saying and exposed to regarding a specific health topic in real time. In this pilot study, we identified and monitored selected data sources during August and September in 2024. We manually analyzed this information to identify common questions, concerns and misinformation about measles vaccination. Combining these insights revealed a wide range of views describing vaccination attitudes, information gaps and themes of distrust and misinformation, but also positive sentiment. This approach provided timely insight into emerging and entrenched public perceptions and showed that social listening can effectively be implemented within a local health service. These findings highlight the potential of integrating social listening into routine public health practice to support responsive and evidence-informed communication strategies.
Related
- From non-uptake during early adolescence to acceptance during a catch-up campaign: a qualitative study of changing HPV vaccination decisions across two life stages among young women in Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cost-effectiveness of 20-valent versus 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines for infants in the Netherlands, taking into account indirect effects and adult vaccination
- Cross-sectional dataset on human papillomavirus (HPV) awareness, vaccination status, and health information sources among adults in five states of Nigeria
- Functional Listening Difficulties in Children With ADHD: Associations With Language Abilities
- Three pillars for digital health assessment in LMICs: a mini review of technology benchmarking, digital health literacy, and social media listening
BibTeX
@misc{bisschops2026generating,
title = {{Generating Insights Into (Mis)Information About Measles Vaccination in Amsterdam Through Social Listening, the Netherlands, 2024}},
author = {K. Bisschops and J. C. M. Heijne and C. Lovell and H. L. Coppoolse and M. L. Stein and B. van den Putte and E. Smit and T. S. Boender},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.14.26355158},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.14.26355158v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Generating Insights Into (Mis)Information About Measles Vaccination in Amsterdam Through Social Listening, the Netherlands, 2024
AU - K. Bisschops
AU - J. C. M. Heijne
AU - C. Lovell
AU - H. L. Coppoolse
AU - M. L. Stein
AU - B. van den Putte
AU - E. Smit
AU - T. S. Boender
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/14
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.14.26355158
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.14.26355158v1
AB - Suboptimal vaccination coverage for Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) and increases in measles cases in the Netherlands prompted innovation to support informed vaccine decision-making. Through an iterative approach, this pilot implemented and evaluated social listening in the context of a local public health authority, namely Public Health Service Amsterdam. As a pilot study, we generated insights in measles vaccination. First, potential online and offline social listening data sources were identified. Second, in August-September 2024, data on measles vaccination discourse were gathered. Third, quantitative and qualitative (thematic) analyses were applied to generate insights, and risk assessment was conducted to determine their potential impact on health attitudes. We identified twenty sources for social listening. Six were selected for monitored based on feasibility and relevance. These sources were Public Health Service Amsterdam internal observations (public health professionals observations, source and contact tracers calls, and press inquiries) and three social and news media sources: Coosto, LexisNexis, and Google Trends. Results revealed diverse health beliefs, risk perceptions, concerns, and misinformation shaping vaccination attitudes. Prevalent themes included false claims on effectiveness, causes and effects of measles (vaccination), practical concerns and questions, and positive sentiments. Online and offline social listening enabled insight generation into public health perceptions during an anticipated measles outbreak. This approach is essential for understanding public needs, addressing misinformation, and informing targeted communication during public health challenges. Author SummaryDeclining vaccination coverage for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) in the Netherlands and concerns about a potential rise in measles cases prompted efforts to better understand public attitudes toward vaccination. To support informed decision-making, we tested a new approach called social listening within the Public Health Service Amsterdam. Social listening combines information from multiple, different sources, both online (e.g. social media, news, and search trends) and offline sources (such as source and contact tracers and reports from public health professionals) to understand what people are saying and exposed to regarding a specific health topic in real time. In this pilot study, we identified and monitored selected data sources during August and September in 2024. We manually analyzed this information to identify common questions, concerns and misinformation about measles vaccination. Combining these insights revealed a wide range of views describing vaccination attitudes, information gaps and themes of distrust and misinformation, but also positive sentiment. This approach provided timely insight into emerging and entrenched public perceptions and showed that social listening can effectively be implemented within a local health service. These findings highlight the potential of integrating social listening into routine public health practice to support responsive and evidence-informed communication strategies.
ER -