Strengthening the foundations of shared decision-making in oncology: Systematic review and formal representation of theoretical models
Abstract
Objectives: Shared decision-making (SDM) is central to person-centred care, and particularly critical in oncology. Yet, its clinical implementation remains inconsistent. A strong theoretical foundation is essential for developing and sustaining effective SDM practices. Formal representation of theories enhances clarity and testability, enabling the accumulation of reliable evidence to support implementation. We systematically reviewed SDM models in oncology and formally mapped the constructs proposed, their definitions and operationalization, and the hypothesized relationships among them. Methods: Peer-reviewed articles describing SDM models in oncology were searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane library. Constructs, definitions, and interrelationships were extracted and visualised using an ontology-based modelling system. Study quality was assessed using a modified QuADS tool. Findings were synthesised narratively. Results: Twenty studies were included, spanning diverse methodologies and cancer localisations. A total of 225 constructs were identified. The models varied in focus, terminology, and detail. Nine models focused on the SDM process only, describing diverse sequences of steps using different terms, among which four common steps could be identified: exchange information; discuss alternatives; elicit patient values and preferences; and make a decision. Ten models included SDM determinants at patient-, clinician-, healthcare system- and treatment-level, and interpersonal and social factors. Six models included SDM outcomes such as satisfaction with care, decision or relationship, health and quality of life. Three models specified other components, i.e. SDM actors, goals or assumptions. Ambiguity in construct definitions and interrelationships was common, and several models lacked explicit theoretical propositions. Conclusions and practice implications: Beyond the commonalities identified across models, the diversity and lack of formal specification of oncology-specific SDM models pose challenges for the development, evaluation and implementation of SDM interventions in practice. Given the theoretical fragmentation and current challenges in SDM implementation, advancing theory remains crucial to inform practice and improve patient outcomes.
Related
- An Integrative Somatic Approach to Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy: Theoretical Foundations and Biological Mechanisms
- Theoretical Foundations
- Fleming Fund Implementation in Kenya: What Have We Learned About Strengthening One Health Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance for Decision-making?
- Neural latent representation of implicit perceptual decision confidence signatures from brain-wide intracranial EEG
- Strengthening agricultural extension services to enhance farmers’ capacity and resilience for sustainable development; a systematic review
BibTeX
@article{carpio2026strengthening,
title = {{Strengthening the foundations of shared decision-making in oncology: Systematic review and formal representation of theoretical models}},
author = {Laura del Carpio and Thibaut Reverdy and Julien Péron and Montserrat Gil-Girbau and María Rubio-Valera and Alexandra Lelia Dima},
journal = {Patient Education and Counseling},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.pec.2026.109661},
url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05613789v1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Strengthening the foundations of shared decision-making in oncology: Systematic review and formal representation of theoretical models
AU - Laura del Carpio
AU - Thibaut Reverdy
AU - Julien Péron
AU - Montserrat Gil-Girbau
AU - María Rubio-Valera
AU - Alexandra Lelia Dima
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/29
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2026.109661
UR - https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05613789v1
AB - Objectives: Shared decision-making (SDM) is central to person-centred care, and particularly critical in oncology. Yet, its clinical implementation remains inconsistent. A strong theoretical foundation is essential for developing and sustaining effective SDM practices. Formal representation of theories enhances clarity and testability, enabling the accumulation of reliable evidence to support implementation. We systematically reviewed SDM models in oncology and formally mapped the constructs proposed, their definitions and operationalization, and the hypothesized relationships among them. Methods: Peer-reviewed articles describing SDM models in oncology were searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane library. Constructs, definitions, and interrelationships were extracted and visualised using an ontology-based modelling system. Study quality was assessed using a modified QuADS tool. Findings were synthesised narratively. Results: Twenty studies were included, spanning diverse methodologies and cancer localisations. A total of 225 constructs were identified. The models varied in focus, terminology, and detail. Nine models focused on the SDM process only, describing diverse sequences of steps using different terms, among which four common steps could be identified: exchange information; discuss alternatives; elicit patient values and preferences; and make a decision. Ten models included SDM determinants at patient-, clinician-, healthcare system- and treatment-level, and interpersonal and social factors. Six models included SDM outcomes such as satisfaction with care, decision or relationship, health and quality of life. Three models specified other components, i.e. SDM actors, goals or assumptions. Ambiguity in construct definitions and interrelationships was common, and several models lacked explicit theoretical propositions. Conclusions and practice implications: Beyond the commonalities identified across models, the diversity and lack of formal specification of oncology-specific SDM models pose challenges for the development, evaluation and implementation of SDM interventions in practice. Given the theoretical fragmentation and current challenges in SDM implementation, advancing theory remains crucial to inform practice and improve patient outcomes.
SN - 0738-3991
ER -