REST: Routing with En-route Seating Thresholds for pedestrian accessibility
Abstract
Public seating can support walking by providing opportunities to rest at useful positions along complete journeys. We introduce a route-based framework that assesses nearby seating, access to everyday destinations, and whether rests are well spaced along routes. One method finds the shortest route that does not exceed a chosen distance without rest; another allows longer stretches but adds a cost expressed as equivalent walking distance. We apply the framework to Mannheim, Germany. With a 1,000 m travel budget and a 500 m limit on walking without an opportunity to rest, 99.5% of older residents in Feudenheim lived within 500 m of a rest, yet only 33.5% could reach at least one destination in each of five categories (food shops, pharmacies, primary healthcare, public transport, and community services) on ordinary shortest routes meeting this limit. Finding alternative routes with sufficiently spaced rests increased this share to 61.4%; allowing longer stretches with an added cost raised it to 76.2%, compared with 89.7% when resting needs were ignored. Across Mannheim, 20.2% of older residents lost access to a reachable category when routes required a resting opportunity every 500 m, versus 7.1% when longer stretches were allowed at extra cost. Compared with the shortest physical distance, the least burdensome routes incurred extra costs from seating gaps: a median of 7.3 m of equivalent walking distance across city areas (90th percentile: 45.9 m). Better-placed seating could reduce this burden without changing street layouts. These measures help planners identify deficiencies, test improvements and guide route choices.
Related
- Effect of the sliding condition of the gluteus on the response of a finite element model for seating
- Towards modelling abreast to in-file transitions in small pedestrian groups
- Adjusting for Social Groups in Spatial Point Process Models for Waiting Pedestrian Configurations
- Almost invariant subspaces in the topologically non-trivial setting: a pedestrian approach
- Tight Communication Bounds for Distributed Algorithms in the Quantum Routing Model
BibTeX
@misc{fulman2026rest,
title = {{REST: Routing with En-route Seating Thresholds for pedestrian accessibility}},
author = {Nir Fulman and Himshikhar Mazumdar},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.07095},
eprint = {2611.07095},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07095},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - REST: Routing with En-route Seating Thresholds for pedestrian accessibility
AU - Nir Fulman
AU - Himshikhar Mazumdar
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/04
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.07095
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07095
AB - Public seating can support walking by providing opportunities to rest at useful positions along complete journeys. We introduce a route-based framework that assesses nearby seating, access to everyday destinations, and whether rests are well spaced along routes. One method finds the shortest route that does not exceed a chosen distance without rest; another allows longer stretches but adds a cost expressed as equivalent walking distance. We apply the framework to Mannheim, Germany. With a 1,000 m travel budget and a 500 m limit on walking without an opportunity to rest, 99.5% of older residents in Feudenheim lived within 500 m of a rest, yet only 33.5% could reach at least one destination in each of five categories (food shops, pharmacies, primary healthcare, public transport, and community services) on ordinary shortest routes meeting this limit. Finding alternative routes with sufficiently spaced rests increased this share to 61.4%; allowing longer stretches with an added cost raised it to 76.2%, compared with 89.7% when resting needs were ignored. Across Mannheim, 20.2% of older residents lost access to a reachable category when routes required a resting opportunity every 500 m, versus 7.1% when longer stretches were allowed at extra cost. Compared with the shortest physical distance, the least burdensome routes incurred extra costs from seating gaps: a median of 7.3 m of equivalent walking distance across city areas (90th percentile: 45.9 m). Better-placed seating could reduce this burden without changing street layouts. These measures help planners identify deficiencies, test improvements and guide route choices.
ER -