Competition, concurrence, and cooperation between external and internal attention
Abstract
Attention can be selectively directed to both external sensory inputs and internally generated representations. The relationship between these external and internal attentional states is not fixed but varies between competition, concurrence, and cooperation. However, the conditions that allow for each of these relationships to occur remain poorly understood. We distinguish between the level of brain states and behavior and synthesize evidence for each of these relationships at both levels. Our review shows that shared, capacity-limited mechanisms and opposing computational modes (e.g., encoding vs. retrieval) often produce competitive dynamics, particularly in the presence of simultaneous and incompatible demands. At the same time, several studies have revealed partially independent substrates that permit concurrent selection of internal and external information, especially when controlled, intentional processing is not required. More recently, researcher have started exploring conditions under which external and internal can support or facilitate each other, enabling cooperative integration in the service of a single goal. We argue that task demands, degree of control, representational overlap, and the considered timescale jointly determine whether external and internal attention compete, co-occur, or cooperate, and we outline key directions for future work aimed at a more nuanced understanding of how these states jointly shape cognition.
Related
- Subject-Specific Analysis of Self-Initiated Attention Shifts from EEG with Controlled Internal and External Attention Conditions
- External and internal attention: Mind the role of switches for memory functioning
- How multilevel competition drives cooperation in stigmergic systems
- Limitation of External Nutrient Supply Effects by Iron-Driven Internal Phosphorus Cycling in Semi-Enclosed Coastal Waters: A Case Study of Mikawa Bay
- Beyond sperm competition: perspectives on sperm economy from external fertilizing fishes
BibTeX
@misc{verschooren2026competition,
title = {{Competition, concurrence, and cooperation between external and internal attention}},
author = {Sam Verschooren and Tobias Egner and Mariam Aly},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/ry94x_v2},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/ry94x_v2/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Competition, concurrence, and cooperation between external and internal attention
AU - Sam Verschooren
AU - Tobias Egner
AU - Mariam Aly
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/12
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/ry94x_v2
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/ry94x_v2/
AB - Attention can be selectively directed to both external sensory inputs and internally generated representations. The relationship between these external and internal attentional states is not fixed but varies between competition, concurrence, and cooperation. However, the conditions that allow for each of these relationships to occur remain poorly understood. We distinguish between the level of brain states and behavior and synthesize evidence for each of these relationships at both levels. Our review shows that shared, capacity-limited mechanisms and opposing computational modes (e.g., encoding vs. retrieval) often produce competitive dynamics, particularly in the presence of simultaneous and incompatible demands. At the same time, several studies have revealed partially independent substrates that permit concurrent selection of internal and external information, especially when controlled, intentional processing is not required. More recently, researcher have started exploring conditions under which external and internal can support or facilitate each other, enabling cooperative integration in the service of a single goal. We argue that task demands, degree of control, representational overlap, and the considered timescale jointly determine whether external and internal attention compete, co-occur, or cooperate, and we outline key directions for future work aimed at a more nuanced understanding of how these states jointly shape cognition.
ER -