Surgical Treatment of Necrotizing Pancreatitis
- 1Department of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 23507, USA
Abstract
Necrotizing pancreatitis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in cases with infected necrosis. The management of these complex patients has radically shifted in the past 2 decades with major advances in the percutaneous, endoscopic and minimally invasive surgical techniques employed in the care of these patients. The step-up approach, incorporating percutaneous drainage and endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy, reserving surgical debridement for a small subset of patients, has significantly improved clinical outcomes. Delayed and minimally invasive approaches are now preferred to traditional open necrosectomy, with laparoscopic transgastric necrosectomy as an option. Transgastric necrosectomy has been established as a first-line treatment for debridement. Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) and sinus tract endoscopy (STE) are the most useful surgical approaches and are invaluable in cases where percutaneous drainage or endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy prove inadequate or incomplete. Open necrosectomy is reserved for rare cases with refractory infection, anatomical constraints, concurrent intra-abdominal pathology and lack of familiarity with minimally invasive approaches, but timely transfer to a regional center of excellence is encouraged. This review summarizes the evolution of contemporary surgical techniques, highlights the best evidence and delineates the role of each technique in a multidisciplinary framework.
Related
- Acute Pancreatitis Caused by Impaction of Migrated Surgical Staples in the Duodenal Papilla After Distal Pancreatectomy
- Necrotizing Enterocolitis Secondary to Congenital Syphilis in an 18-Day-Old Neonate: Successful Treatment With Intravenous Penicillin.
- Osteopathic manipulative treatment as an adjunct therapy in a pediatric patient with chronic pancreatitis and visceral hyperalgesia: a case report
- Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Treatment for Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Common Bile Duct Stones: Incidence and Risk Factors for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
- Long‐Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Large Periapical Lesions Managed by Non‐Surgical and Surgical Endodontic Treatment: A Case Series
BibTeX
@article{gaitanidis2026surgical,
title = {{Surgical Treatment of Necrotizing Pancreatitis}},
author = {Apostolos Gaitanidis and Jay N. Collins},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/jcm15218380},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8380},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Surgical Treatment of Necrotizing Pancreatitis
AU - Apostolos Gaitanidis
AU - Jay N. Collins
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO - 10.3390/jcm15218380
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8380
AB - Necrotizing pancreatitis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in cases with infected necrosis. The management of these complex patients has radically shifted in the past 2 decades with major advances in the percutaneous, endoscopic and minimally invasive surgical techniques employed in the care of these patients. The step-up approach, incorporating percutaneous drainage and endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy, reserving surgical debridement for a small subset of patients, has significantly improved clinical outcomes. Delayed and minimally invasive approaches are now preferred to traditional open necrosectomy, with laparoscopic transgastric necrosectomy as an option. Transgastric necrosectomy has been established as a first-line treatment for debridement. Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) and sinus tract endoscopy (STE) are the most useful surgical approaches and are invaluable in cases where percutaneous drainage or endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy prove inadequate or incomplete. Open necrosectomy is reserved for rare cases with refractory infection, anatomical constraints, concurrent intra-abdominal pathology and lack of familiarity with minimally invasive approaches, but timely transfer to a regional center of excellence is encouraged. This review summarizes the evolution of contemporary surgical techniques, highlights the best evidence and delineates the role of each technique in a multidisciplinary framework.
SN - 2077-0383
ER -