Bridging theory and practice in medical education: evaluating a faculty development masterclass using a commitment-to-change framework in a resource-variable setting
- 1Division of Translational Anatomy, Radiology Department, University of Massachusetts T.H Chan School of Medicine, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
- 2Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, PMB 5025, Nnewi, Anambra State Nigeria
- 3Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu Campus, Nsukka, Nigeria
Abstract
Background: Despite advances in medical education, translating educational theory into routine teaching practice remains challenging. Faculty development programs often demonstrate high participant satisfaction but limited evidence of behavior change. The Commitment-to-Change (CtC) framework offers a method for evaluating whether educational interventions lead to practice modification. This study evaluated whether a theory-informed faculty development masterclass grounded in cognitive science and instructional design principles could promote early implementation of evidence-based teaching strategies among medical educators.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, multi-stage evaluation of a two-session synchronous virtual faculty development masterclass delivered through the Society of Experimental and Clinical Anatomical Scientists of Nigeria (SECAN). Current and aspiring medical and allied health educators from multiple institutions were recruited through SECAN’s professional networks using email and social media. Data were collected electronically using online surveys, including a pre-masterclass needs assessment, post-session knowledge and application readiness assessment with CtC elicitation, post-masterclass evaluation, and a four-week follow-up survey assessing implementation and sustainability intentions. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative responses were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Results: Ninety-two participants completed the pre-masterclass survey, with 42 attending the sessions. Eighteen participants completed the knowledge and readiness assessment, achieving a mean score of 79.2%. All participants (100%) articulated at least one CtC statement. Fifteen participants completed the post-masterclass evaluation, with high overall ratings (mean 4.62/5) and a Net Promoter Score of + 93.3. At four weeks, 12 participants responded to follow-up; 75.0% reported attempting their committed teaching change, and 91.7% indicated plans to sustain or scale the change. Implementation was reported across large-group, small-group, laboratory, and online teaching settings, although contextual barriers including time constraints, limited resources, and institutional factors were commonly identified.
Conclusions: A brief, theory-informed faculty development masterclass incorporating structured application and CtC elicitation was associated with high levels of participant satisfaction, strong intention to change, and substantial early implementation of teaching strategies. These findings suggest that short-duration, theory-informed faculty development interventions incorporating structured application and CtC activities can facilitate the early translation of learning science principles into teaching practice, even in resource-variable settings. Future work should examine long-term sustainability and institutional factors influencing adoption.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10068-2.
Related
- From Knowledge to Practice: Evaluating a Targeted Faculty Development Program for Medical Educators Using the Kirkpatrick Framework.
- Development and validation of a digital learning resource quality evaluation framework: a mixed-methods study in health professions education
- Co-designing a framework of the influences for the implementation of whole school approaches to Physical Education, School Sport and Physical Activity (PESSPA) in UK primary schools: development of the PESSPA Improvement Framework (PIF)
- Young ERC Masterclass Journal Club Article: The EVIDENCE Trial
- Evaluating sexual violence prevention and response strategies in higher education: insights from a systematic review of North American universities
BibTeX
@article{okafor2026bridging,
title = {{Bridging theory and practice in medical education: evaluating a faculty development masterclass using a commitment-to-change framework in a resource-variable setting}},
author = {Izuchukwu Azuka Okafor and Smart Ikechukwu Mbagwu and Emmanuel Anayochukwu Esom},
journal = {BMC Medical Education},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12909-026-10068-2},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10068-2},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Bridging theory and practice in medical education: evaluating a faculty development masterclass using a commitment-to-change framework in a resource-variable setting
AU - Izuchukwu Azuka Okafor
AU - Smart Ikechukwu Mbagwu
AU - Emmanuel Anayochukwu Esom
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/31
JO - BMC Medical Education
DO - 10.1186/s12909-026-10068-2
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10068-2
AB - Background: Despite advances in medical education, translating educational theory into routine teaching practice remains challenging. Faculty development programs often demonstrate high participant satisfaction but limited evidence of behavior change. The Commitment-to-Change (CtC) framework offers a method for evaluating whether educational interventions lead to practice modification. This study evaluated whether a theory-informed faculty development masterclass grounded in cognitive science and instructional design principles could promote early implementation of evidence-based teaching strategies among medical educators. Methods: We conducted a prospective, multi-stage evaluation of a two-session synchronous virtual faculty development masterclass delivered through the Society of Experimental and Clinical Anatomical Scientists of Nigeria (SECAN). Current and aspiring medical and allied health educators from multiple institutions were recruited through SECAN’s professional networks using email and social media. Data were collected electronically using online surveys, including a pre-masterclass needs assessment, post-session knowledge and application readiness assessment with CtC elicitation, post-masterclass evaluation, and a four-week follow-up survey assessing implementation and sustainability intentions. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative responses were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Ninety-two participants completed the pre-masterclass survey, with 42 attending the sessions. Eighteen participants completed the knowledge and readiness assessment, achieving a mean score of 79.2%. All participants (100%) articulated at least one CtC statement. Fifteen participants completed the post-masterclass evaluation, with high overall ratings (mean 4.62/5) and a Net Promoter Score of + 93.3. At four weeks, 12 participants responded to follow-up; 75.0% reported attempting their committed teaching change, and 91.7% indicated plans to sustain or scale the change. Implementation was reported across large-group, small-group, laboratory, and online teaching settings, although contextual barriers including time constraints, limited resources, and institutional factors were commonly identified. Conclusions: A brief, theory-informed faculty development masterclass incorporating structured application and CtC elicitation was associated with high levels of participant satisfaction, strong intention to change, and substantial early implementation of teaching strategies. These findings suggest that short-duration, theory-informed faculty development interventions incorporating structured application and CtC activities can facilitate the early translation of learning science principles into teaching practice, even in resource-variable settings. Future work should examine long-term sustainability and institutional factors influencing adoption. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10068-2.
SN - 1472-6920
ER -