Intercropping on French farms: Reducing pesticide and N fertiliser use while maintaining gross margins
Abstract
Experimental studies to date have demonstrated the agronomic and environmental benefits of intercropping, making it a key diversification method for reducing chemical inputs in agriculture. However, intercropping is still a niche practice in European cropping systems, particularly for arable crops. Few studies have focused on farmers’ perspectives or used farm data to assess the on-farm performances of intercropping. Here, we present an analysis of data collected from farms of the DEPHY network, a demonstration farm network that aims to show that pesticide use can be reduced through changes in farming practices. We focused our study on four main species in France: winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), pea (Pisum sativum L.) and rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). We carried out paired comparison tests between sole crops and intercrops for each species (16 pairs for winter wheat, 12 for winter barley, 15 for peas and 31 for rapeseed) to compare the use of pesticides (herbicides, fungicides, insecticides and all pesticides combined), mineral nitrogen fertiliser and the gross margin. We showed that pesticide use was reduced on average by 40–50% in the case of wheat- and barley-based intercrops compared with sole wheat and barley crops, respectively. Pesticide use for peas was reduced by 72% on average. Nitrogen fertiliser use was also reduced by up to 38% for wheat. On the other hand, in the case of rapeseed, which is mainly intercropped with unharvested companion plants, we found no significant differences in pesticide or fertiliser use between the sole crops and intercrops. This suggests that farmers must choose companion plants carefully depending on their objectives and desired services. Finally, our findings show that intercropping negatively affects gross margins for wheat, but gross margins are maintained for barley-, pea- and rapeseed-based intercrops compared to sole crops.
Related
- Dairy farmers’ preferences for reducing pesticide use: does workload matter? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment among dairy farmers in Brittany, France
- Nutritional content of the African horned cucumber (Cucumis metuliferus E. May. Ex Naudin) fruit grown under varying fertiliser types and growing environments, and its potential role in human nutrition
- Editorial: Legume intercropping and rotation: impacts on soil microbiomes
- Increased Strip Width Balancing Interspecific Competition and Enhanced Yield in Maize–Flax Intercropping Systems
- The partitioning of yield gain among component species in intercropping: A global meta-analysis
BibTeX
@article{yan2026intercropping,
title = {{Intercropping on French farms: Reducing pesticide and N fertiliser use while maintaining gross margins}},
author = {Elodie Yan and Nicolas Munier-Jolain and Philippe Martin and Marco Carozzi},
journal = {European Journal of Agronomy},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1016/j.eja.2023.127036},
url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04301593v2},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Intercropping on French farms: Reducing pesticide and N fertiliser use while maintaining gross margins
AU - Elodie Yan
AU - Nicolas Munier-Jolain
AU - Philippe Martin
AU - Marco Carozzi
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/16
JO - European Journal of Agronomy
DO - 10.1016/j.eja.2023.127036
UR - https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04301593v2
AB - Experimental studies to date have demonstrated the agronomic and environmental benefits of intercropping, making it a key diversification method for reducing chemical inputs in agriculture. However, intercropping is still a niche practice in European cropping systems, particularly for arable crops. Few studies have focused on farmers’ perspectives or used farm data to assess the on-farm performances of intercropping. Here, we present an analysis of data collected from farms of the DEPHY network, a demonstration farm network that aims to show that pesticide use can be reduced through changes in farming practices. We focused our study on four main species in France: winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), pea (Pisum sativum L.) and rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). We carried out paired comparison tests between sole crops and intercrops for each species (16 pairs for winter wheat, 12 for winter barley, 15 for peas and 31 for rapeseed) to compare the use of pesticides (herbicides, fungicides, insecticides and all pesticides combined), mineral nitrogen fertiliser and the gross margin. We showed that pesticide use was reduced on average by 40–50% in the case of wheat- and barley-based intercrops compared with sole wheat and barley crops, respectively. Pesticide use for peas was reduced by 72% on average. Nitrogen fertiliser use was also reduced by up to 38% for wheat. On the other hand, in the case of rapeseed, which is mainly intercropped with unharvested companion plants, we found no significant differences in pesticide or fertiliser use between the sole crops and intercrops. This suggests that farmers must choose companion plants carefully depending on their objectives and desired services. Finally, our findings show that intercropping negatively affects gross margins for wheat, but gross margins are maintained for barley-, pea- and rapeseed-based intercrops compared to sole crops.
SN - 1161-0301
SN - 1873-7331
ER -