Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Two-State Dynamical Synapses as a Physical Substrate for Equilibrium Propagation

Abstract

Equilibrium Propagation (EqProp) updates each synapse by comparing a local term at the free and nudged equilibria. Because these two values occur at different times, a physical implementation requires temporary local memory. We show that this memory can emerge from a two-timescale synaptic model in which neural and volatile synaptic dynamics are jointly derived from a single energy function. A volatile state w relaxes toward the product of the pre- and postsynaptic activities, while a non-volatile state M stores the learned parameter. At equilibrium, w equals the local term entering the EqProp update. Using its net change between phases implements phase-based EqProp, while transferring its successive changes during nudging yields continual EqProp, in which the temporal comparison is carried by the synaptic dynamics themselves. On MNIST with a single-hidden-layer network, the phase-based model reaches 2.01 ± 0.09% test error versus 2.00 ± 0.13% for standard EqProp, and the continual model reaches 2.24 ± 0.11% versus 2.28 ± 0.16% for continual EqProp. The framework further specifies the dynamical requirements that a volatile--non-volatile synaptic device must satisfy to implement this learning mechanism.

Related

  1. Equilibrium propagation in non-equilibrium quantum systems
    Aditya Gandotra, David D. Noachtar, Aashish A. Clerk
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Exploring Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions via the Dynamical Phase Accumulated at an Equilibrium Critical Point
    Han-Chuan Kou, Peng Li, Zhi-Han Zhang +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Emergent hydrodynamic response and dynamical backreaction: Magnon bound-state propagation in a Bose-Hubbard fluid
    Andrés N. Cáliz, Arnau Riera, Enrique Rico +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtomic, molecular & optical physicsCondensed matterarXiv
  4. Action-level characterization of gravitational-wave propagation in dynamical Barbero--Immirzi gravity
    Zhi-Fu Gao, Hui Wang, Luiz Carlos Garcia de Andrade +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  5. Machine learning-based thermoelectric materials screening with physical consistency and uncertainty propagation
    Abid Ahmad, Mohammad Naved Qureshi, Shabbab Ali Algamdi +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersNumerical analysis & scientific computingPLOSEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@misc{liu2026twostate,
  title = {{Two-State Dynamical Synapses as a Physical Substrate for Equilibrium Propagation}},
  author = {Dongshu Liu and Julie Grollier},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.18058},
  eprint = {2610.18058},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18058},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Two-State Dynamical Synapses as a Physical Substrate for Equilibrium Propagation
AU  - Dongshu Liu
AU  - Julie Grollier
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.18058
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18058
AB  - Equilibrium Propagation (EqProp) updates each synapse by comparing a local term at the free and nudged equilibria. Because these two values occur at different times, a physical implementation requires temporary local memory. We show that this memory can emerge from a two-timescale synaptic model in which neural and volatile synaptic dynamics are jointly derived from a single energy function. A volatile state w relaxes toward the product of the pre- and postsynaptic activities, while a non-volatile state M stores the learned parameter. At equilibrium, w equals the local term entering the EqProp update. Using its net change between phases implements phase-based EqProp, while transferring its successive changes during nudging yields continual EqProp, in which the temporal comparison is carried by the synaptic dynamics themselves. On MNIST with a single-hidden-layer network, the phase-based model reaches 2.01 ± 0.09% test error versus 2.00 ± 0.13% for standard EqProp, and the continual model reaches 2.24 ± 0.11% versus 2.28 ± 0.16% for continual EqProp. The framework further specifies the dynamical requirements that a volatile--non-volatile synaptic device must satisfy to implement this learning mechanism.
ER  -