Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

On the Theoretical Limits of Learning Unconstrained Interatomic Potentials

Abstract

Machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) accelerate molecular dynamics (MD) simulations by learning the energies and forces that govern atomic motion. Recent work has shown that relaxing physical inductive biases can improve computational efficiency and predictive accuracy, raising the question of whether energy-and-force matching alone is sufficient to ensure accurate sampling. We show that, for unconstrained hypothesis classes, the relationship between prediction error and sampling accuracy is exponentially ill-conditioned in dimension. In particular, prediction errors that decay exponentially with dimension can coexist with nearly maximal total variation distance between the learned and target distributions. We identify two failure mechanisms. The first is kinetic trapping, where relaxation to an accurate learned equilibrium requires exponentially long times, even when simulations are initialized from training configurations at which energies and forces are matched exactly. The second is equilibrium mismatch, where the learned stationary distribution itself remains far from the target. Under explicit assumptions, we show that equilibrium mismatch can persist even in local, symmetry-preserving models, where small per-atom errors coexist with a distributional discrepancy that approaches its maximum as system size increases. Finally, we establish global energy-control conditions that guarantee equilibrium accuracy and identify additional conditions required for rapid relaxation.

Related

  1. Correcting the Liquid Densities of Universal Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials Using Local-Number-Density Repulsion
    Shunsuke Mieda
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  2. pdb2reaction: End-to-End Reaction-Path Elucidation from PDB Structures Using Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials
    Takuto Ohmura, Hajime Sato, Tohru Terada
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  3. Applicability Domain of Universal Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials at Solid-State Battery Interfaces
    Umang Agarwal, Mengke Li, Gopalakrishnan Sai Gautam +1
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  4. How accurate are foundational machine learning interatomic potentials for heterogeneous catalysis?
    Luuk H. E. Kempen, Raffaele Cheula, Mie Andersen
    The Journal of Chemical PhysicsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text9 citedMaterials & polymersOpenAlex
  5. Reference Conventions and Structure Types, Rather Than 4f Occupancy, Shape Lanthanide Errors in Universal Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials
    Jungko Moni Chakma, Md. Mynul Hasan, Mohammad Asaduzzaman Chowdhury
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{ananth2026theoretical,
  title = {{On the Theoretical Limits of Learning Unconstrained Interatomic Potentials}},
  author = {Prajwal Ananth and Shuwen Yue},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.15078},
  eprint = {2610.15078},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15078},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - On the Theoretical Limits of Learning Unconstrained Interatomic Potentials
AU  - Prajwal Ananth
AU  - Shuwen Yue
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/10
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.15078
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15078
AB  - Machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) accelerate molecular dynamics (MD) simulations by learning the energies and forces that govern atomic motion. Recent work has shown that relaxing physical inductive biases can improve computational efficiency and predictive accuracy, raising the question of whether energy-and-force matching alone is sufficient to ensure accurate sampling. We show that, for unconstrained hypothesis classes, the relationship between prediction error and sampling accuracy is exponentially ill-conditioned in dimension. In particular, prediction errors that decay exponentially with dimension can coexist with nearly maximal total variation distance between the learned and target distributions. We identify two failure mechanisms. The first is kinetic trapping, where relaxation to an accurate learned equilibrium requires exponentially long times, even when simulations are initialized from training configurations at which energies and forces are matched exactly. The second is equilibrium mismatch, where the learned stationary distribution itself remains far from the target. Under explicit assumptions, we show that equilibrium mismatch can persist even in local, symmetry-preserving models, where small per-atom errors coexist with a distributional discrepancy that approaches its maximum as system size increases. Finally, we establish global energy-control conditions that guarantee equilibrium accuracy and identify additional conditions required for rapid relaxation.
ER  -