Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCureus

Comparative Outcomes of Radical Surgery, Conservative Surgery, and Percutaneous Treatment for Active Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

  1. 1General Surgery, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagamangala, IND.
  2. 2General Surgery, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Medical College, Bengaluru, IND.
  3. 3Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagamangala, IND.

Abstract

Background

Treatment of active hepatic cystic echinococcosis (CE) depends on cyst stage and clinical features. Comparative outcomes of radical surgery, conservative surgery, and percutaneous treatment remain uncertain. We compared outcomes across these strategies in a single-center cohort.Methods

We retrospectively reviewed adults treated at a tertiary-care center in Karnataka, India, between January 2020 and December 2024. Patients were grouped by definitive intervention: radical surgery (n = 15), conservative surgery (n = 18), or percutaneous puncture, aspiration, injection, and re-aspiration (PAIR) (n = 8). Outcomes included treatment success, complications, hospital stay, and recurrence.Results

World Health Organization Informal Working Group on Echinococcosis (WHO-IWGE) stage distribution differed among groups (p < 0.001): CE3b (daughter cysts within a solid matrix) accounted for 80.0% of the radical group, 55.6% of the conservative group, and 25.0% of the PAIR group. Treatment success was observed in 15/15 patients (100.0%) after radical surgery, 15/18 (83.3%) after conservative surgery, and 4/8 (50.0%) after PAIR (p = 0.007). Complications occurred in 2/15 (13.3%), 6/18 (33.3%), and 5/8 (62.5%), respectively (p = 0.038). Mean hospital stay was 6.1, 9.8, and 3.5 days, respectively (p < 0.001). Recurrence occurred in 0/15, 2/18 (11.1%), and 2/8 (25.0%).Conclusion

Radical surgery had the highest observed treatment success and no recorded recurrence in this cohort. Because treatment groups differed by cyst stage and treatment was not randomized, these findings are exploratory and do not establish comparative superiority.

Related

  1. Omentoplasty Versus Tube Drainage After Conservative Surgery for Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis at High Risk of Biliary Complications: A Prospective Comparative Study
    Bilal Aydın, Metin Yıldız, Nurhak Aksungur +4
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
  2. Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy for Highly Migrated Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Comparative Study With Quantitative MRI-Based Decompression Analysis.
    Shanxi Wang, Jianbin Guan, Tuanjiang Liu +4
    Global spine journalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  3. Comparative Outcomes of Ultrasound-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD) Due to Malignant Obstructive Jaundice: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.
    Marco Giurdanella, Domenico Laganà, Caterina Battaglia +9
    Life (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Study of a Negative Pressure‐Guided Technique
    Botao Zhang, Zihan Wang, Shibing Zhang +7
    Orthopaedic SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  5. Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression for single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective comparative study involving clinical efficacy and cost analysis
    Yu Zhang, Jidong Ju, Jinchun Wu
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{nanjundaiah2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative Outcomes of Radical Surgery, Conservative Surgery, and Percutaneous Treatment for Active Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.}},
  author = {Rajesh K Nanjundaiah and Vinod B N Kumar and Vikram Ramamurthy and Naveen Narayan and Pallavi H R},
  journal = {Cureus},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.118952},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42968990},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative Outcomes of Radical Surgery, Conservative Surgery, and Percutaneous Treatment for Active Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
AU  - Rajesh K Nanjundaiah
AU  - Vinod B N Kumar
AU  - Vikram Ramamurthy
AU  - Naveen Narayan
AU  - Pallavi H R
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.118952
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42968990
AB  - Background  Treatment of active hepatic cystic echinococcosis (CE) depends on cyst stage and clinical features. Comparative outcomes of radical surgery, conservative surgery, and percutaneous treatment remain uncertain. We compared outcomes across these strategies in a single-center cohort.Methods  We retrospectively reviewed adults treated at a tertiary-care center in Karnataka, India, between January 2020 and December 2024. Patients were grouped by definitive intervention: radical surgery (n = 15), conservative surgery (n = 18), or percutaneous puncture, aspiration, injection, and re-aspiration (PAIR) (n = 8). Outcomes included treatment success, complications, hospital stay, and recurrence.Results  World Health Organization Informal Working Group on Echinococcosis (WHO-IWGE) stage distribution differed among groups (p < 0.001): CE3b (daughter cysts within a solid matrix) accounted for 80.0% of the radical group, 55.6% of the conservative group, and 25.0% of the PAIR group. Treatment success was observed in 15/15 patients (100.0%) after radical surgery, 15/18 (83.3%) after conservative surgery, and 4/8 (50.0%) after PAIR (p = 0.007). Complications occurred in 2/15 (13.3%), 6/18 (33.3%), and 5/8 (62.5%), respectively (p = 0.038). Mean hospital stay was 6.1, 9.8, and 3.5 days, respectively (p < 0.001). Recurrence occurred in 0/15, 2/18 (11.1%), and 2/8 (25.0%).Conclusion  Radical surgery had the highest observed treatment success and no recorded recurrence in this cohort. Because treatment groups differed by cyst stage and treatment was not randomized, these findings are exploratory and do not establish comparative superiority.
SN  - 2168-8184
ER  -