Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,332 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0PsyArXiv

Does autonomy enhance satisfaction, adherence and clinical outcomes? A Randomized Controlled Trial of a digital mental health intervention for college students

Abstract

Background: College students face high rates of mental health problems including depression and stress. Digital interventions offer accessible support, but adherence remains challenging. Autonomy may enhance motivation, yet its role in student-focused digital interventions is not explored yet in a randomized controlled trial. Objective: This study examines whether enhancing autonomy in a guided digital CBT-based mental health intervention for college students (LifeHack) improves satisfaction, adherence, and mental health outcomes. Methods: In a two-armed randomized trial, 575 students were assigned to either a structured intervention or an autonomy-enhanced version in which participants could select topics of interest. Assessments were conducted at baseline and 5 weeks later (post-intervention). Primary outcomes were general satisfaction (CSQ-8) and working alliance with the program and e-coach (WAI-I); secondary outcomes included adherence, mental well-being (MHC-SF), depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and quality of life (MHQoL). Results: Participants were moderately satisfied with the intervention and guidance, and showed small-to-moderate improvements in mental well-being, depressive and anxiety symptoms, and quality of life from baseline to post-intervention (all p < .001; Cohen’s d ranging 0.24-0.41). However, no significant differences were observed between conditions on satisfaction, adherence or clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Allowing users to freely choose lesson topics did not enhance satisfaction, adherence, or clinical outcomes compared with a structured lesson sequence. Nonetheless, participation in LifeHack was associated with improved mental health, indicating potential intervention effectiveness regardless of the autonomy features. Future research should test more comprehensive autonomy-supportive designs and compare LifeHack with inactive control conditions to establish intervention effectiveness.

Related

  1. Effectiveness of a Sequential Simulation and Online Learning Intervention on Psychiatric Mental Health Nurses’ Motivational Interviewing Knowledge, Confidence, and Skill Performance for Medication Adherence: A Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial
    Wen-Ling Hsieh, I-Hsien Li, Tsui-Mei Hung +2
    Asian Nursing ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyDOAJ
  2. A multilevel intervention to improve adherence to prostate cancer active surveillance versus usual care: results from a pilot randomized controlled trial.
    Jason C Chen, Ted A Skolarus, Allison Furgal +5
    BMC cancerPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  3. Effectiveness of behavioral interventions on knowledge, attitude, and adherence to prenatal Multiple Micro-nutrients Suplement among pregnant women in Ethiopia: a post-test only cluster randomized controlled trial
    Tolasa Yadate, Ephrem Lejore, Tenagnework Eseyneh Dagnaw +8
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsCrossref
  4. Effectiveness of adherence intervention programmes for home exercises in stroke survivors: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Weiwei Guo, Kim Lam Soh, Hasni Idayu Saidi +1
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefDOAJPMC
  5. Efficacy of a weighted-vest aerobic dance intervention for enhancing lower extremity strength and mobility in older adults: a randomized controlled trial
    Sasithorn Sukjit, Bhakbhum Choktaweepanich, Worrawut Thuwakum
    Physical activity and nutritionPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{ozmen2026does,
  title = {{Does autonomy enhance satisfaction, adherence and clinical outcomes? A Randomized Controlled Trial of a digital mental health intervention for college students}},
  author = {Sevin Ozmen and Leonore de Wit and Arpana Amarnath and Annemieke van Straten and Struijs, S.Y. (Sascha)},
  howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/kzq4s_v1},
  url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/kzq4s_v1/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Does autonomy enhance satisfaction, adherence and clinical outcomes? A Randomized Controlled Trial of a digital mental health intervention for college students
AU  - Sevin Ozmen
AU  - Leonore de Wit
AU  - Arpana Amarnath
AU  - Annemieke van Straten
AU  - Struijs, S.Y. (Sascha)
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - PsyArXiv
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/kzq4s_v1
UR  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/kzq4s_v1/
AB  - Background: College students face high rates of mental health problems including depression and stress. Digital interventions offer accessible support, but adherence remains challenging. Autonomy may enhance motivation, yet its role in student-focused digital interventions is not explored yet in a randomized controlled trial. Objective: This study examines whether enhancing autonomy in a guided digital CBT-based mental health intervention for college students (LifeHack) improves satisfaction, adherence, and mental health outcomes. Methods: In a two-armed randomized trial, 575 students were assigned to either a structured intervention or an autonomy-enhanced version in which participants could select topics of interest. Assessments were conducted at baseline and 5 weeks later (post-intervention). Primary outcomes were general satisfaction (CSQ-8) and working alliance with the program and e-coach (WAI-I); secondary outcomes included adherence, mental well-being (MHC-SF), depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and quality of life (MHQoL). Results: Participants were moderately satisfied with the intervention and guidance, and showed small-to-moderate improvements in mental well-being, depressive and anxiety symptoms, and quality of life from baseline to post-intervention (all p < .001; Cohen’s d ranging 0.24-0.41). However, no significant differences were observed between conditions on satisfaction, adherence or clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Allowing users to freely choose lesson topics did not enhance satisfaction, adherence, or clinical outcomes compared with a structured lesson sequence. Nonetheless, participation in LifeHack was associated with improved mental health, indicating potential intervention effectiveness regardless of the autonomy features. Future research should test more comprehensive autonomy-supportive designs and compare LifeHack with inactive control conditions to establish intervention effectiveness.
ER  -