Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0ISME Communications

Optimal growth temperature is not an adequate proxy of microbial cold adaptation

Abstract

Microbial thermal adaptation is commonly characterized using the minimum (Tmin), optimum (Topt), and maximum (Tmax) temperatures that define the thermal growth range of microorganisms; with Topt been frequently used to compare microbial thermal characteristics. Although previous studies have shown that Tmin and Topt reflect distinct aspects of microbial thermal physiology, the generality and quantitative limits of this relationship across microbial diversity have not been systematically evaluated. Here, we constructed a dataset of 14 023 microbial growth-temperature records to examine the relationships among Tmin, Topt, and Tmax. While Topt showed strong overall correlations with both Tmax (r = 0.910, R2 = 0.827, Padj < .05) and Tmin (r = 0.793, R2 = 0.628, Padj < .05), the strength of these relationships varied markedly across the temperature spectrum. Within the lower-temperature range, the association between Topt and Tmin became weak and statistically insignificant (r = 0.106, Padj = .200). Furthermore, within 10–30°C Topt range, microorganisms sharing similar Topt values frequently exhibited substantially different Tmin values, indicating considerable variation in their capacity for growth at low temperatures despite comparable Topt. These findings demonstrate that Topt and Tmin provide complementary rather than interchangeable information about microbial thermal characteristics, and Topt alone is insufficient to predict lower thermal growth limits. Our study provides the most comprehensive quantitative assessment to date of the relationship between microbial cardinal growth temperatures, defining the limitations of using Topt to predict lower thermal growth limits and highlighting the importance of explicitly reporting Tmin in ecological, evolutionary and taxonomic studies.

Related

  1. π-MNovo improves de novo peptide sequencing through microbial-domain adaptation and evidence-guided candidate selection
    J. Ye, X. Zhang, B. Sun +9
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  2. Temperature-dependent phage-bacterium coexistence strategy mediates the intestinal microbial community diversity in shrimp
    Zhixuan Deng, Dongwei Hou, Renjun Zhou +9
    MicrobiomePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0EcologyCrossref
  3. Coupled enzyme discovery, evolution and synthetic yeast chassis adaptation for microbial biopolymer valorisation
    M. d. C. Sanchez Olmos, J. Gonzales Isa, N. Paczia +5
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
  4. Editorial: Salt-stress-relieving and growth-promoting microbial diversity and its interaction mechanism with plant rhizosphere
    Yingwu Shi, Zahir Ahmad Zahir, Xiaolin Wang
    Frontiers in MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0MicrobiologyCrossref
  5. Host Pre-Adaptation and Sublethal Indoxacarb Interactively Affect Growth and Development of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, with Potential Involvement of P450 and Juvenile Hormone-Related Genes
    Sunan Shen, Ronggen Wen, Yajun Yang +9
    InsectsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{wu2026optimal,
  title = {{Optimal growth temperature is not an adequate proxy of microbial cold adaptation}},
  author = {Peng Wu and Ying Wang and Sha Yi and Qianqian Zhang and Yilin Shu and Yan Liao and Liang Shen},
  journal = {ISME Communications},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/ismeco/ycag300},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/ismeco/ycag300},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Optimal growth temperature is not an adequate proxy of microbial cold adaptation
AU  - Peng Wu
AU  - Ying Wang
AU  - Sha Yi
AU  - Qianqian Zhang
AU  - Yilin Shu
AU  - Yan Liao
AU  - Liang Shen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
JO  - ISME Communications
DO  - 10.1093/ismeco/ycag300
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/ismeco/ycag300
AB  - Microbial thermal adaptation is commonly characterized using the minimum (Tmin), optimum (Topt), and maximum (Tmax) temperatures that define the thermal growth range of microorganisms; with Topt been frequently used to compare microbial thermal characteristics. Although previous studies have shown that Tmin and Topt reflect distinct aspects of microbial thermal physiology, the generality and quantitative limits of this relationship across microbial diversity have not been systematically evaluated. Here, we constructed a dataset of 14 023 microbial growth-temperature records to examine the relationships among Tmin, Topt, and Tmax. While Topt showed strong overall correlations with both Tmax (r = 0.910, R2 = 0.827, Padj < .05) and Tmin (r = 0.793, R2 = 0.628, Padj < .05), the strength of these relationships varied markedly across the temperature spectrum. Within the lower-temperature range, the association between Topt and Tmin became weak and statistically insignificant (r = 0.106, Padj = .200). Furthermore, within 10–30°C Topt range, microorganisms sharing similar Topt values frequently exhibited substantially different Tmin values, indicating considerable variation in their capacity for growth at low temperatures despite comparable Topt. These findings demonstrate that Topt and Tmin provide complementary rather than interchangeable information about microbial thermal characteristics, and Topt alone is insufficient to predict lower thermal growth limits. Our study provides the most comprehensive quantitative assessment to date of the relationship between microbial cardinal growth temperatures, defining the limitations of using Topt to predict lower thermal growth limits and highlighting the importance of explicitly reporting Tmin in ecological, evolutionary and taxonomic studies.
SN  - 2730-6151
ER  -