Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Sex differences in fear extinction are conditional, not categorical

  1. 1UMC Utrecht

Abstract

Threat memories are dynamic, and their behavioral expression can change with subsequent experience and the passage of time. Extinction training can reduce conditioned fear responses, yet these responses may re-emerge over time through spontaneous recovery. Although biological sex has been implicated as modulatory factor in fear and extinction memory processes, studies have reported inconsistent findings. Here, we investigated how differences in extinction training and the timing of memory assessment influence extinction memory in male and female mice. Using contextual fear conditioning, we assessed fear acquisition and threat retention, characterized within-session and across-session extinction during repeated training, and compared shorter (3-minute) and longer (6-minute) daily extinction sessions. We subsequently evaluated extinction memory retention and spontaneous recovery at a later time point. Estrous-cycle stage in females was monitored daily throughout the experimental protocol to examine its potential association with fear and extinction behavior. We found that males and females demonstrated comparable fear acquisition and threat memory, as well as similar extinction progression across days. During longer extinction sessions, but not shorter, males showed greater within-session reductions in freezing, whereas females exhibited modestly higher overall freezing. We found no significant sex difference in the magnitude of spontaneous recovery. There was no significant association between estrous-cycle stage and freezing behavior. Together, our findings suggest that sex-dependent differences in contextual fear extinction are not uniformly expressed, but rather depend on the experimental conditions under which extinction is assessed

Related

  1. Synaptic GABA dysfunction of thalamocortical neurons impairs sleep spindle morphology and fear extinction.
    F. Katsuki, M. C. Bauer, M. J. Vaughn +5
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  2. Selective Dopamine Transporter Inhibition with CE-123 Promotes Fear Extinction and Alters the Basolateral Amygdala Proteome Following Fear Extinction in Adolescent Male Rats
    Pawel Grochecki, Malgorzata Hopcias, Justyna Lubinska +5
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NeuroscienceCrossref
  3. A Standardized Protocol for Fear Extinction Enhancement Research
    Xandra Kredlow, Meghan Whalen, Patrick Laing +5
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  4. Fear learning–induced brain dynamics predict individual extinction memory expression following transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Kai Zhang, Lihan Cui, B.Isabel Moallem +7
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  5. Silencing basal forebrain cholinergic input to the infralimbic cortex renders fear extinction resistant to renewal
    B. P. P. Lay, B. Chieng, S. Maren +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{nguyen2026differences,
  title = {{Sex differences in fear extinction are conditional, not categorical}},
  author = {M. T. Nguyen and A. Didachos and B. Roozendaal and M. J. A. G. Henckens and K. Gulmez Karaca},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.27.762318},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.762318v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sex differences in fear extinction are conditional, not categorical
AU  - M. T. Nguyen
AU  - A. Didachos
AU  - B. Roozendaal
AU  - M. J. A. G. Henckens
AU  - K. Gulmez Karaca
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.27.762318
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.762318v1
AB  - Threat memories are dynamic, and their behavioral expression can change with subsequent experience and the passage of time. Extinction training can reduce conditioned fear responses, yet these responses may re-emerge over time through spontaneous recovery. Although biological sex has been implicated as modulatory factor in fear and extinction memory processes, studies have reported inconsistent findings. Here, we investigated how differences in extinction training and the timing of memory assessment influence extinction memory in male and female mice. Using contextual fear conditioning, we assessed fear acquisition and threat retention, characterized within-session and across-session extinction during repeated training, and compared shorter (3-minute) and longer (6-minute) daily extinction sessions. We subsequently evaluated extinction memory retention and spontaneous recovery at a later time point. Estrous-cycle stage in females was monitored daily throughout the experimental protocol to examine its potential association with fear and extinction behavior. We found that males and females demonstrated comparable fear acquisition and threat memory, as well as similar extinction progression across days. During longer extinction sessions, but not shorter, males showed greater within-session reductions in freezing, whereas females exhibited modestly higher overall freezing. We found no significant sex difference in the magnitude of spontaneous recovery. There was no significant association between estrous-cycle stage and freezing behavior. Together, our findings suggest that sex-dependent differences in contextual fear extinction are not uniformly expressed, but rather depend on the experimental conditions under which extinction is assessed
ER  -