Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
PreprintCC BY-SA 4.0arXiv

Gestalt: a meta-foundation model for astronomy

Abstract

The Platonic Representation Hypothesis predicts that sufficiently scaled foundation models converge on a shared representation of the world. As each non-converged model gives a noisy view of a common structure when passed the same input, we ask whether we can combine models into a representation that outperforms its individual components. We test this on galaxies: we embed images via a basket of 22 frozen foundation models from eight families, whiten each view, and take a randomised SVD of the embedding concatenation. The resulting 1024-dimensional embedding outperforms every basket member on 19/21 of our tested metrics for physical property and galaxy morphology estimation for HSC, JWST, and DESI Legacy Survey imagery. We find that performance rises with basket size and basket architectural diversity, and that the meta-foundation model's performance transfers across astronomical surveys. We conclude that a useful astronomical foundation model can be assembled from existing generalist models with no training required beyond a single unsupervised projection. By leveraging the community's already-spent work, we save a lot of compute: a fresh pre-train of a comparable single-domain model would cost 𝒪(104--105) A100 GPU hours (emitting several tonnes of CO2eq.), whereas assembling Gestalt requires minutes on a single machine.

Related

  1. DINOspec: Efficient Multimodal Alignment of Vision and Spectral Foundation Models for Astronomy
    Erica Lastufka, Mariia Drozdova, Daniel Schaerer +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  2. Transitioning from ADS to SciX to Serve 21st Century Astronomy
    Jennifer Lynn Bartlett, Suze Kundu, Alberto Accomazzi +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  3. From Axion Detection to Dark Matter Astronomy
    Jae Hyeok Chang, Stefano Profumo
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  4. Neutrino Astronomy at High Energies - An Experimental Review
    Christian Spiering
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsarXiv
  5. The Promise of Gravitational-Wave Astronomy
    Parameswaran Ajith
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyHigh-energy astrophysicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{smith2026gestalt,
  title = {{Gestalt: a meta-foundation model for astronomy}},
  author = {Michael J. Smith and Shashwat Sourav},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.38312},
  eprint = {2609.38312},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38312},
  note = {CC BY-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Gestalt: a meta-foundation model for astronomy
AU  - Michael J. Smith
AU  - Shashwat Sourav
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.38312
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38312
AB  - The Platonic Representation Hypothesis predicts that sufficiently scaled foundation models converge on a shared representation of the world. As each non-converged model gives a noisy view of a common structure when passed the same input, we ask whether we can combine models into a representation that outperforms its individual components. We test this on galaxies: we embed images via a basket of 22 frozen foundation models from eight families, whiten each view, and take a randomised SVD of the embedding concatenation. The resulting 1024-dimensional embedding outperforms every basket member on 19/21 of our tested metrics for physical property and galaxy morphology estimation for HSC, JWST, and DESI Legacy Survey imagery. We find that performance rises with basket size and basket architectural diversity, and that the meta-foundation model's performance transfers across astronomical surveys. We conclude that a useful astronomical foundation model can be assembled from existing generalist models with no training required beyond a single unsupervised projection. By leveraging the community's already-spent work, we save a lot of compute: a fresh pre-train of a comparable single-domain model would cost 𝒪(10^4--10^5) A100 GPU hours (emitting several tonnes of CO_2eq.), whereas assembling Gestalt requires minutes on a single machine.
ER  -