The peace and operational psychology debates on counterterrorism: Unanswered questions, lessons learned, and implications for future practice
- 1District of Columbia, DBH, Forensic Services Division, USA
Abstract
Psychologists aiding the U.S. government in counterterrorism operations may be the most controversial topic in the history of the healing professions and applied psychology. Absent much contention, operationally-minded psychologists have long provided assessment and selection procedures, resilience-building interventions for operators, and consultations to leadership in furtherance of team building, resource optimization, and cohesiveness throughout the national security establishment. Of much greater concern to their critics, the peace psychologists, operationally-minded psychologists have also provided consultations, training, and subject matter expertise in relation to assessing, detaining, and interrogating accused terrorists with lesser legal protections and external oversight. Related subjects of debate have spanned from the late 19th century through the aftermath of 9/11, honed in on the relationship between the American Psychological Association (APA) and federal government agencies, and led to reforms in law, Department of Defense (DoD)/Department of War (DoW) policy, and psychology ethics and practice. From this narrative emerges unanswered questions and lessons learned in regards to the Global War on Terror (GWOT) detainees still housed at the military detention facility at Guantánamo Bay Cuba (GTMO), whether reforms have led to widespread changes in practice, and psychology’s role and responsibilities in an ever-evolving threat landscape.
Related
- Placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells for prenatal myelomeningocele repair: promise, pitfalls, and unanswered questions after phase I of the CuRe trial
- Hidden labor, monitoring, and exit burdens after hospital operational AI deployment: implications for resource-constrained Chinese hospitals
- Lithological control of natural radioactivity in Baltic coastal sands and implications for pre-operational radiological monitoring
- To Tap or Not to Tap? A Still Unanswered Question for Lumbar Puncture and Treatment Strategies in Asymptomatic Pediatric Papilledema: A Narrative Review
- Evaluation of the psychology of earthquake victims referred to plastic surgery service after crush injury: a cross-sectional study
BibTeX
@article{danzer2026peace,
title = {{The peace and operational psychology debates on counterterrorism: Unanswered questions, lessons learned, and implications for future practice}},
author = {Graham Danzer},
journal = {Global Security: Health, Science and Policy},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1080/23779497.2026.2735804},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/23779497.2026.2735804},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - The peace and operational psychology debates on counterterrorism: Unanswered questions, lessons learned, and implications for future practice
AU - Graham Danzer
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/02
JO - Global Security: Health, Science and Policy
DO - 10.1080/23779497.2026.2735804
UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/23779497.2026.2735804
AB - Psychologists aiding the U.S. government in counterterrorism operations may be the most controversial topic in the history of the healing professions and applied psychology. Absent much contention, operationally-minded psychologists have long provided assessment and selection procedures, resilience-building interventions for operators, and consultations to leadership in furtherance of team building, resource optimization, and cohesiveness throughout the national security establishment. Of much greater concern to their critics, the peace psychologists, operationally-minded psychologists have also provided consultations, training, and subject matter expertise in relation to assessing, detaining, and interrogating accused terrorists with lesser legal protections and external oversight. Related subjects of debate have spanned from the late 19th century through the aftermath of 9/11, honed in on the relationship between the American Psychological Association (APA) and federal government agencies, and led to reforms in law, Department of Defense (DoD)/Department of War (DoW) policy, and psychology ethics and practice. From this narrative emerges unanswered questions and lessons learned in regards to the Global War on Terror (GWOT) detainees still housed at the military detention facility at Guantánamo Bay Cuba (GTMO), whether reforms have led to widespread changes in practice, and psychology’s role and responsibilities in an ever-evolving threat landscape.
SN - 2377-9497
SN - 2377-9489
ER -