Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,851 studies31 sourcesUpdated 36 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0arXiv

Hyperbolic Graph Representation Learning: Embed in One Metric, Optimize with Another

Abstract

Hierarchical graphs embed in hyperbolic space with lower distortion than in Euclidean space owing to its negative curvature. However, their gradient-based learning is hampered at large radii, where the Poincaré ball and the Lorentz hyperboloid models fail numerically. Polar coordinates avoid this problem, but the hyperbolic metric scales the angular step by the hyperbolic sine of the radius, freezing angular motion. We observe that this factor is a choice, silently fixed by existing implementations: the Euclidean tangent parametrization, for instance, uses the radius itself. We show that other choices are not only possible but preferable. They are endpoints of a one-parameter family of optimization preconditioners with curvatures from −1 to $0$, while the embedding remains at curvature −1. We show that since the Euclidean preconditioner rearranges a layout but refines it poorly, while an intermediate one refines far better once a layout is in place, combining them in two stages reduces the loss on real-world trees by 46-74% over the best single curvature.

Related

  1. HyCoSeq: Contextual Hyperbolic Representation Learning for Genomic Sequences
    Chenhao Zeng, Zhibin Pu, Shufei Ge
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGenetics & genomicsStatisticsarXiv
  2. Compact Quantum Metric Spaces from Weakly Geodesic Length Functions on Hyperbolic Groups
    Are Austad
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  3. Volume Entropy and Scalar Curvature near a Hyperbolic Metric
    Xiaodong Wang, Bo Zhu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  4. The sharp Lipschitz continuity problem with respect to the pseudo hyperbolic metric
    Shaolin Chen, Hidetaka Hamada, Manzi Huang +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. Poincaré Beta Balls: Radial Laws, Hyperbolic Shell Metric Transforms, and Critical-Limit Regimes
    Shigeaki Yokota
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{larroca2026hyperbolic,
  title = {{Hyperbolic Graph Representation Learning: Embed in One Metric, Optimize with Another}},
  author = {Federico Larroca and Paola Bermolen and Marcelo Fiori and Bernardo Marenco},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.06745},
  eprint = {2610.06745},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06745},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Hyperbolic Graph Representation Learning: Embed in One Metric, Optimize with Another
AU  - Federico Larroca
AU  - Paola Bermolen
AU  - Marcelo Fiori
AU  - Bernardo Marenco
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.06745
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06745
AB  - Hierarchical graphs embed in hyperbolic space with lower distortion than in Euclidean space owing to its negative curvature. However, their gradient-based learning is hampered at large radii, where the Poincaré ball and the Lorentz hyperboloid models fail numerically. Polar coordinates avoid this problem, but the hyperbolic metric scales the angular step by the hyperbolic sine of the radius, freezing angular motion. We observe that this factor is a choice, silently fixed by existing implementations: the Euclidean tangent parametrization, for instance, uses the radius itself. We show that other choices are not only possible but preferable. They are endpoints of a one-parameter family of optimization preconditioners with curvatures from −1 to $0$, while the embedding remains at curvature −1. We show that since the Euclidean preconditioner rearranges a layout but refines it poorly, while an intermediate one refines far better once a layout is in place, combining them in two stages reduces the loss on real-world trees by 46-74% over the best single curvature.
ER  -