Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,544 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Einstein Telescope: the triangle in a network and the impact of the relative orientation of detectors

Abstract

The geometrical configuration of the Einstein Telescope (ET) gravitational-wave observatory is one the most important design choices to be made for this future scientific facility. Two baseline configurations are currently being considered, a single triangle or 2 distant L-shaped detectors tilted by about 45∘. In this document we present a study of the scientific performance of the ET baseline configurations in both stand-alone mode and in the presence of either an L-shaped Cosmic Explorer detector with 40-km long arms located in the United States or the existing LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA network. We also include in the study an alternative ET configuration, which is currently not being considered and consists of a triangle plus a distant L-shaped detector. We find that in stand-alone mode this alternative configuration performs significantly better than the other two in both the compact binary coalescence and stochastic gravitational wave background scientific cases. The differences in performance between the ET configurations are reduced in the presence of the considered, additional non-ET detectors. We also show that the impact of possible correlated noise in co-located detectors on the stochastic gravitational-wave background performance can be addressed with the addition of extra detectors. Finally, we study the impact on the ET scientific performance of the relative orientation of the future detectors in the network. We find that, while the configurations that include a triangular ET detector are basically insensitive to this orientation, a balanced compromise for the ET configuration consisting of two L-shaped detectors could be represented by a tilt angle between the two detectors of about 30∘.

Related

  1. In-flight calibration of the Wide-field X-ray Telescope on board the Einstein Probe
    Huaqing Cheng, Hai-Wu Pan, Yuan Liu +14
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsApplied physics & instrumentationCrossref
  2. Environmental Noise Challenges for the Einstein Telescope - A Review
    Matteo Di Giovanni
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  3. Scalable and sequential inference of the neutron star equation of state with the Einstein Telescope
    Thibeau Wouters, Thomas C. K. Ng, Hauke Koehn +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  4. Detection of cosmic strings by gravitational wave lensing. Predictions for Einstein Telescope
    Jakub Szyndler, Tomasz Bulik
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  5. A Broadband Room-Temperature Design for the Einstein Telescope
    Teng Zhang, Amit Singh Ubhi, Huan Yang +21
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsApplied physics & instrumentationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{bruno2026einstein,
  title = {{Einstein Telescope: the triangle in a network and the impact of the relative orientation of detectors}},
  author = {Giacomo Bruno and Antonin Oswald and Federico De Lillo},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.17446},
  eprint = {2610.17446},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17446},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Einstein Telescope: the triangle in a network and the impact of the relative orientation of detectors
AU  - Giacomo Bruno
AU  - Antonin Oswald
AU  - Federico De Lillo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.17446
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17446
AB  - The geometrical configuration of the Einstein Telescope (ET) gravitational-wave observatory is one the most important design choices to be made for this future scientific facility. Two baseline configurations are currently being considered, a single triangle or 2 distant L-shaped detectors tilted by about 45^∘. In this document we present a study of the scientific performance of the ET baseline configurations in both stand-alone mode and in the presence of either an L-shaped Cosmic Explorer detector with 40-km long arms located in the United States or the existing LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA network. We also include in the study an alternative ET configuration, which is currently not being considered and consists of a triangle plus a distant L-shaped detector. We find that in stand-alone mode this alternative configuration performs significantly better than the other two in both the compact binary coalescence and stochastic gravitational wave background scientific cases. The differences in performance between the ET configurations are reduced in the presence of the considered, additional non-ET detectors. We also show that the impact of possible correlated noise in co-located detectors on the stochastic gravitational-wave background performance can be addressed with the addition of extra detectors. Finally, we study the impact on the ET scientific performance of the relative orientation of the future detectors in the network. We find that, while the configurations that include a triangular ET detector are basically insensitive to this orientation, a balanced compromise for the ET configuration consisting of two L-shaped detectors could be represented by a tilt angle between the two detectors of about 30^∘.
ER  -