Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,544 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Synergistic Learning in Domain Adaptation with a Known Link: A Minimax Understanding

Abstract

When can combining source and target data yield much better performance than using either alone? From a minimax viewpoint, writing R(n,nT) for the minimax risk from n source and nT target observations, we ask when R(n,nT) decays strictly faster than both R(n,0) and R(0,nT). We call this the Synergistic Learning Phenomenon (SLP) and quantify it by the Synergistic Advantage Ratio SAR=min(R(n,0),R(0,nT))/R(n,nT). We study domain adaptation with a known link: source regression f, target regression g=𝒜f for a known operator 𝒜, and possibly different designs. Three links---identity, integration, and differentiation---and the density ratio ρ=hT/hS determine whether synergy is possible, at what rate, and in which sample-size window. For the identity link (covariate shift) with a Beta(a,1) source and uniform target, a known necessary condition for SLP is a≥2+1/(2β), where β is the smoothness of f (Result I). An integral link g(x)=∫0xf(t) dt can yield the joint rate (nnT)−1/2 even for a bounded ratio (Result II), and under a Beta(a,1) source has a phase diagram with cuts at a=2 and a=3: integral SLP for 1<a<2, an extra level-split rate nT−1 for 2<a<3, and covariate-shift-type spatial SLP for a>3 (Result III). A derivative link g=ḟ synergizes only under a stronger singularity (Result IV), giving a sharp integration--differentiation asymmetry under a bounded ratio. Across all three links, synergy arises from role separation: each dataset resolves a distinct bottleneck associated with the link and designs. We characterize the sample-size windows for synergy and how SAR varies with n and nT. Simulations support the predicted phase structure, and a mirrored integration--differentiation analysis of real vehicle and smartphone signals illustrates the asymmetry.

Related

  1. Retrieval-Based In-Context Learning: A Domain Adaptation Framework
    Yilun Zhu, Naihao Deng, Yingcong Li +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Joint Contrastive-Adversarial Representation Learning for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation
    Yuling Jiao, Lican Kang, Jerry Zhijian Yang +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Minimax-Optimal Robust Identification of Continuous-Time Systems: Handling Narrow-Band Disturbances in the Frequency Domain
    Jonas Gillberg, Fredrik Gustafsson
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. A Domain-specific adaptation network for elliptic interface problems
    Jiaqi Luo, Hongmei Kang, Xingye Yue +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  5. Language-Induced Priors for Domain Adaptation
    Qiyuan Chen, Jiayu Zhou, Raed Al Kontar
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{xiang2026synergistic,
  title = {{Synergistic Learning in Domain Adaptation with a Known Link: A Minimax Understanding}},
  author = {Pengcheng Xiang and Ling Zhou and Yuhong Yang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.15576},
  eprint = {2610.15576},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15576},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Synergistic Learning in Domain Adaptation with a Known Link: A Minimax Understanding
AU  - Pengcheng Xiang
AU  - Ling Zhou
AU  - Yuhong Yang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/11
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.15576
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15576
AB  - When can combining source and target data yield much better performance than using either alone? From a minimax viewpoint, writing R(n,n_T) for the minimax risk from n source and n_T target observations, we ask when R(n,n_T) decays strictly faster than both R(n,0) and R(0,n_T). We call this the Synergistic Learning Phenomenon (SLP) and quantify it by the Synergistic Advantage Ratio SAR=min(R(n,0),R(0,n_T))/R(n,n_T). We study domain adaptation with a known link: source regression f, target regression g=𝒜f for a known operator 𝒜, and possibly different designs. Three links---identity, integration, and differentiation---and the density ratio ρ=h_T/h_S determine whether synergy is possible, at what rate, and in which sample-size window. For the identity link (covariate shift) with a Beta(a,1) source and uniform target, a known necessary condition for SLP is a≥2+1/(2β), where β is the smoothness of f (Result I). An integral link g(x)=∫_0^xf(t) dt can yield the joint rate (nn_T)^−1/2 even for a bounded ratio (Result II), and under a Beta(a,1) source has a phase diagram with cuts at a=2 and a=3: integral SLP for 1<a<2, an extra level-split rate n_T^−1 for 2<a<3, and covariate-shift-type spatial SLP for a>3 (Result III). A derivative link g=ḟ synergizes only under a stronger singularity (Result IV), giving a sharp integration--differentiation asymmetry under a bounded ratio. Across all three links, synergy arises from role separation: each dataset resolves a distinct bottleneck associated with the link and designs. We characterize the sample-size windows for synergy and how SAR varies with n and n_T. Simulations support the predicted phase structure, and a mirrored integration--differentiation analysis of real vehicle and smartphone signals illustrates the asymmetry.
ER  -