Policy Learning with Observational Data: The Case of Hepatitis C Treatment for HIV/HCV Co-Infected Patients
Abstract
Decision-makers frequently must choose a single action from a finite set of alternatives -- for example, physicians selecting a treatment, investors choosing a portfolio risk level, or judges determining sentences. To improve outcomes, policymakers often issue policy rules or guidelines to inform such choices. In this paper, I show how to generally derive policy rules from observational data in a multi-action framework under relatively weak assumptions about the underlying structure of the heterogeneous sampled population. Conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) are consistently estimated via a weighted K-means algorithm, assuming the outcome model is correctly specified within each homogeneous subgroup. I then use standard decision trees to implement feasible policy rules, allowing for both perfect and imperfect adherence to treatment. The methodology is applied to treatment options for Hepatitis C (HCV) among patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), a setting in which no uniform guideline exists for modern pharmaceutical therapies. The results identify a subgroup of patients with approximately an 80% probability of spontaneous HCV clearance without treatment. Estimation results also show that reallocating treatments among treated patients could have reduced total treatment costs by CAN$2.5-4.5 million while increasing aggregate health benefits relative to the status quo. These findings demonstrate that the proposed approach can generate improved, data-driven treatment guidelines for the management of HIV/HCV co-infected patients.
Related
- Threshold Geometry, Bifurcation, and Data-Driven Analysis of a Vaccination-Treatment Model for Hepatitis B
- Regarding the inference of causality in observational non-controlled studies. Comment on “Assessment of sexual function and its association with quality of life and disease severity in patients with atopic dermatitis”
- Treatment persistence drives estimator performance in longitudinal causal inference based on observational data: A simulation study
- Bayesian additive regression trees for evaluating treatment benefit predictors using observational data
- Learning Optimal Prescriptive Trees from Observational Data
BibTeX
@misc{langevin2026policy,
title = {{Policy Learning with Observational Data: The Case of Hepatitis C Treatment for HIV/HCV Co-Infected Patients}},
author = {Raphaël Langevin},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.16593},
eprint = {2605.16593},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16593},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Policy Learning with Observational Data: The Case of Hepatitis C Treatment for HIV/HCV Co-Infected Patients
AU - Raphaël Langevin
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.16593
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16593
AB - Decision-makers frequently must choose a single action from a finite set of alternatives -- for example, physicians selecting a treatment, investors choosing a portfolio risk level, or judges determining sentences. To improve outcomes, policymakers often issue policy rules or guidelines to inform such choices. In this paper, I show how to generally derive policy rules from observational data in a multi-action framework under relatively weak assumptions about the underlying structure of the heterogeneous sampled population. Conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) are consistently estimated via a weighted K-means algorithm, assuming the outcome model is correctly specified within each homogeneous subgroup. I then use standard decision trees to implement feasible policy rules, allowing for both perfect and imperfect adherence to treatment. The methodology is applied to treatment options for Hepatitis C (HCV) among patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), a setting in which no uniform guideline exists for modern pharmaceutical therapies. The results identify a subgroup of patients with approximately an 80% probability of spontaneous HCV clearance without treatment. Estimation results also show that reallocating treatments among treated patients could have reduced total treatment costs by CAN$2.5-4.5 million while increasing aggregate health benefits relative to the status quo. These findings demonstrate that the proposed approach can generate improved, data-driven treatment guidelines for the management of HIV/HCV co-infected patients.
ER -